Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

Started by mondrasek, February 13, 2014, 09:17:30 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 49 Guests are viewing this topic.

MarkE

Quote from: mrwayne on March 29, 2014, 04:23:46 PM

Oh I admit something ...  ;)
So are you saying that if every exchange in a system is lossy that no benefit can be made form the whole system?
What if the input to the system is natural - say like a solar cell or a wind generator?
Hmmmm.... Sure a lot of people confused out in the world...
You admit that your system is lossy.  Therefore it cannot on its own deliver any energy such as you falsely claim: "- allowing us to supply endless and abundant clean Energy."

mrwayne

Quote from: MarkE on March 29, 2014, 04:05:59 PM
Thanks for confirming that all plans to have Mark Dansie validate your contraption have been scuttled.  We all know what that means:  You can no longer convince Mark Dansie that you have any chance of demonstrating what you've claimed to have for years.
Mark Dansie is a real skeptic -
What do you call yourself - a person who keeps switching names and getting kicked off sites for being a  8) 8) 8) .
..........................
Mark will be invited with honors - just before we release.
So keep it up Tk, avoid the facts and make things up - or try to learn from those who do not have an agenda
Or do the usual post three pages of trolling ...
The math is not that hard. 

mrwayne

Quote from: MarkE on March 29, 2014, 04:08:50 PM
Respect, LOL!  You've taken money from friends and neighbors alike by lying to them about technology you do not have, never did have, and can never have.  You're feigned manners are those of a pick pocket who says:  "Excuse me." while he lifts his victim's wallet.
Pure made up trash - TK - no one on our team of over 200 feels the way you do - they looked and learned...
Spend some time doing that.

mrwayne

Quote from: MarkE on March 29, 2014, 04:12:41 PM
Are you saying that you haven't been seeking funding Wayne?  Did you know that a registration exemption does not get one off the hook from the anti-fraud provisions of the Acts 1933 and 1934?You have no technology.  You have lies.It may be that the remaining investors are operating in a bunker mentality.  Charlatans have often used the "us versus them" to keep their followers in line.
Oh my gosh you are so desperate...
With our system you get 4000 pounds of buoyancy out of a open system five gallon bucket..
Is that a technology you can consider that people might try to support?
Maybe you can't think of a benefit ................

Well, maybe you are not the inventive - but

mrwayne

Quote from: MarkE on March 29, 2014, 04:17:38 PM


You ahve already admitted that your machines are lossy.  You will never deliver a working free energy device.
So you still think a lossy system can not provide a out put lol....
Making your statements will not change the physics -
p.s. there are lots of people to help you.