Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

[mrwayne]

Open your eyes, and look at the your own quotes, it is you directly promising again and again to do the two day verification. Your words not mine, your promises, not mine, but go ahead continued to deny it and pretend it if didn't happen, and come up with diversionary excuses, I will continue to show the truth of your own words and promises.
Quote from: mrwayne on October 15 2012 on his web siteYou just can't help blatantly lying, even when your own words are in front of you, you are clearly living in denial of reality, and have been doing for at least three years.

You also promised a 50 kW "field unit" at Trinity Baptist Church, within 3 months of funded.(over 3 years ago)

I don't care what you call me, you are a liar and I have proved it and as long as you continue denying your lying I will continue posting your lies back in your face. and unlike you I keep my word....FU and your BS

Powercat - you are  just a picker....

You are not wrong about me being over optimistic, you are not wrong about me being imperfect.
, you are not wrong that many changes happen in development....

Your pic and choose method - proves your lack of experience in product development or your poor character.

This has been a great and wonderful journey - sorry you chose to be negative.
Wayne

[minnie]

   mrwayne,
               what would happen if you built your machine on a weigh platform.
    Would it be anti gravity?
                          John.

[minnie]

   Power is rate of doing work, RPM's which a ZED certainly won't  achieve.
   Need to go to rotary ZED.
                John.

[mrwayne]

Wayne Travis said,
Heck, honest Wayne Travis, aren't you worried about hurting LarryC's, Webby's, RedSunset's, and Mondrasek's feelings? After all..... they are unable to replicate a working system, unable to do the math that you haven't shown.... as far as being unable to think for themselves.... well, you do understand, that's for sure.

First TK - I don't tell people what they can and can't think - you have the market on that.

Second - You proved with your AL scam video - that a video is bogus proof

Third - It is maturity - and the understanding that Super Conservative Net Energy Systems do not require OU
p.s. We have five now....

Fourth - the Black Box test was created to vet systems that do not comply with physics.

Fifth - a self runner only adds questions and speculation.

....................

A wise man explained - arguing about theory is a waste of time - do the math, generate the data.

A successful black box test , a self runner, done that more than once, leads to the question HOW

And if you have all else - but you do not have HOW - you have not Learned.

Thanks for your pretend concern, and attempt to divide, but I asked for no one to take sides - only look for the truth..

It would have been better without the 293 pages of trolling. That's all 

[powercat]

Grab MarkE's spreadsheet revision 4, grab mine and use only the volume of displaced water numbers,, and then do your own math,, you will need to make the changes to revision 4 by yourself so as to not have mine in any way corrupt yours,,

Go ahead and do it,, you will find the same thing I did and the same thing MarkE did.

Then you can stop with this childish posting garbage.

Garbage you call it, I have clearly shown Wayne lied about verification.  they are lies in front of your face, but as you're one of Wayne stooges I don't expect you to admit that. Where is your continuous self running device ?  Where is anyones device that believes in this BS, nowhere how can you have an OU claim for all these years without showing a continuous running device......Queue the diversionary excuses.