Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

[Pirate88179]

It's very hard to pose as a different character.  You pretty much have to be a professional writer.  It's not too hard to recognize the distinct character in the prose of a given person once you get used to them and get to know them.  TK posts like TK.  MarkE posts like MarkE.  It's clear as a bell to me, plus chances are there is a lot of history before they even crossed paths.  From my perspective that's the case.  I am quite certain that it's as clear as a bell to many people around here.

All vectors turn around and point back to you know who.  If he said he had to leave under the advice of his lawyer and then came back, what does that say?  He alleges they are the same person?  This is "camp" without trying to be funny.  It's camp being used (in an attempt) to mesmerize you into a "brain illusion."

In other words, Wayne is giving us a show.  Some people actually still do find humour in it.

MH:

I totally agree.  It can be very easy, even if someone is not trained at all in this, to see that the syntax and other language usage "quirks" jump out if someone is using multiple accounts.  (IST is a good example)
In my opinion, TK is not MarkE and visa versa.

Perhaps it confuses some as both are obviously well educated and know their fields of study well so maybe, to the uneducated, this means they must be the same person?

Bill

[orbut 3000]

MileHigh (or should I say Darth Vader  ), but what is wrong with a good, old fashioned witch hunt?
Pointing at posters whose opinions you don't like and shouting witch! ,witch! adds so much value to the discussion.

[MileHigh]

Also for TK:  I think Mondrasek was just cracking a joke!

[MileHigh]

Orbut 3000:

It's going to be a scary ending!   

MileHigh

[MarkE]

Here is what I am saying MarkE,

The volume of displaced water is

147.6715443014cm^3

Which is a lift force of

1.4481631499N

That means that your spreadsheet can not exceed that force limit, but it does.

If you believe that, then draw a free body diagram that demonstrates it.  You are of course once again wrong.

Using that with your calculations leaves

0.0228982N

after a lift of

2.5501545683mm

Are your calculations wrong?? I doubt it.

This is the anomaly.

There is no anomaly.  There is only your ignorance.

A gain or a loss does not matter,, the math says that they are supposed to be the same.  I have been trying many variations to bring them into alignment,, but no success.

The fact that you say that you have just been "trying many variations" demonstrates that you do not have a good understanding of either the physics or the mathematical representation of the physics that is in the R4 spreadsheet.

I thought that the zero thickness would get rid of any discrepancies,, but that did not work either.

999,999 more skilled like you might lead to progress, or might not.

It does not matter WHAT I put in for the lift force when the start values are not the same.  I can manually change the lift distance and get both very very close,, but we are not talking about something that only has to be close, it must be exact.

The R4 spreadsheet correctly accounts for the forces on each horizontal surface.  Within the numerical precision limits of Excel the answers are exact and audit correctly.