Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

[mrwayne]

Wayne Travesty
You are a liar, you promised public verification, anyone can go back and look at the thread, as you can't be bothered to admit your deception I will re-post your own words, remember these are your words not mine


Quote from: mrwayne on May 28, 2012, 03:20:19 PM
I always keep my word, and I tell the truth even when it hurts
Quote from: mrwayne on May 25, 2012, 04:14:10 PM
I promise, you who wish open sourcing will not be disappointed.
Quote from: mrwayne on June 02, 2012, 06:47:33 AM
We will be releasing to scientific journals and presenting the Data professionally, when Marks Group reccomends.
I look forward to the longevity runs as well, Next weekend is when we have the help to set up the new
plc equipment and software.
Quote from: mrwayne on June 10, 2012, 04:40:37 AM
Mark Dansie has assembled the team for our Extended runs - critical review
Quote from: mrwayne on June 24, 2012, 03:40:11 PM
We will run our pre test runs starting Monday - after we are sure we do not have new clogs
- I call Mark and he will come - the 28 is still our goal.
Quote from: mrwayne on June 27, 2012, 05:16:19 AM
Mark will come as soon as I ask - he is ready too.But I have not asked him to come yet, I might after tommorrows Run.
Quote from: mrwayne on June 30, 2012, 02:27:28 PM
We began running pretrial tests - prior to Mark Dansie's return - I had very much hoped to be done by Wednesday.
Quote from: mrwayne on July 27, 2012, 03:02:09 PM
After this Validation testing and presentation - we will be setting down to a coalition of teams
world wide to bring this technology to the world
Quote from: mrwayne on August 13, 2012, 02:55:02 PM
Mark has set his return for the week of the 20th.
Quote from: mrwayne on August 16, 2012, 03:41:48 PM
We are solving current issues for Mark and the rest of the team's next visit
Quote from: mrwayne on August 25, 2012, 02:32:40 PM
No, I am not sharing run Data with aynone, until we have the system ready to be released
Quote from: mrwayne on August 25, 2012, 10:43:58 PM
Marks third return was delayed because our "new" system would not charge the accumulator
Quote from: markdansie on August 27, 2012, 05:05:15 AM
I still have not seen the two day demo yet , but I never put a time frame on this.
However as with all things as time carries on the confidence level always diminishes.
Quote from: mrwayne on September 28, 2012, 02:42:16 PM
p.s. our optimized system is over 600% efficient.
Quote from: mrwayne on September 28, 2012, 05:11:26 PM
It will all begin in a short time - the validation is just around the corner - I am relieved and excited.
Quote from: mrwayne on October 1 2012 on his web site
We expect to be finished by the end of the week - assuming all goes semi well (parts delivery)
and we will be ready for the Validation!
Quote from: mrwayne on October 15 2012 on his web site
Of course this means we will run a couple days for ourselves before we turn it over to the validation team
- I have been in clear and constant communication with them.
Quote from: mrwayne on October 29 2012 on his web site
I spoke with Mark this morning regarding time lines, and travel arrangements
- we have selected a prevalidation member to come this weekend
Quote from: mrwayne on November 6 2012 on his web site
Do you feel a sense of urgency in our Development?
Have you waited long enough, are you ready to be done with all of the improvements and obstacles,
are you ready for the internal Validation, and the external validation? Me too.
Quote from: mrwayne on November 11, 2012, 04:07:58 PM
Mark is not a member of the "Final Validation team" - so do not make assumptions - Mark has arranged a completly
independant and extremely qualified Validation team.
Quote from: mrwayne on November 22, 2012, 04:22:19 AM
Yes,And thank you.Mark is a valuable part of our efforts.In Mark and mine's last conversation -
just prior to his heading off on his honeymoon - He has two other stops to make and then we
both hope we are ready for him to return her to Chickasha Oklahoma again. Will we be ready?
Quote from: mrwayne on March 10, 2014, 11:24:14 AM
This is my Final Farewell to O/U.comI am not legally able to show TK my "Suasages" again.It is clear MarkE has only one intention... I did have hope.Wayne

You are A troll and a spammer.
What is your excuse for not asking ME or TK to explain why the input is not consumed - while performing work?
Using quotes out of context is not very honest is it?

p.s. I have answered those questions before - it does not make me a liar if you refuse to listen.
good day.
Oh Yeah - if TK Or ME explain why we can not use the energy input after performing external work - you can call me a fraud and liar - until then - you are the Troll...

[MarkE]

One more note for the chalk board:
TO ALL;
THE ZED DISCRIPTION AND FUNCTION HAS BEEN DESCRIBED FOR OVER THREE YEARS.

Yes the useless device has been described and found to be without utility.

THE VERAGE HAS IMPROVED FOR CLARITY, THE PROCESS HAS BEEN OPTIMIZED,

And still a cinderblock is more efficient than any of your devices.

THE BASIC FUNCTION AND METHOD HAS NOT BEEN ALTERED - BY THOSE WHO UNDERSTOOD IT.

Your contraptions and their complete futility has been understood by knowledgeable people for just as long.

WE HAVE IMPROVED OUR UNDERSTANDING, AND IMPROVED THE PROCESS. yET EVEN WITHOUT THOSE IMPROVEMENTS - THE ZED PERFORMS AS DESCRIBED FROM THE BEGINING.

Ah it is back to the a bald-faced lies.  No Wayne:  None of your contraptions have ever produced any excess output energy over input.

IT WOULD BE NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE TO UNDERSTAND THE ZED WITH THE DIVERSIONS OFFERED BY THE SPAMMING TROLLS
IGNORING THE TROLLS IS YOUR CHOICE - BUT WILL GREATLY IMPROVE YOUR UNDERSTANDING OF A WORKING SYSTEM.
Thank you all
Wayne

You do not now have, nor have you ever had a system that works as you claim.

[MarkE]

OHH double down on your out huh?
ME - your contraption that you try to confuse people as mine - had no load - mine always did.

No it did not that I ever saw.  But you are free to try and point out any actual output load.  I don't think you will.  Let's find out.

So what are the moaning groaning production cylinders on top of the ZED DOING?

They make useless noises.

I guess with all the blow up shots tk posted trying to claim a drain line was an extension cord Mark D missed - - next to the production cyclinders missed your eye....

sorry, doesn't wash Wayne.  You could have as easily showed your trash cans lined up for trash day.  No output was shown.

Or maybe the video running and the discussions on the storage of the production missed your eyes.

Well of course you talked and told fanciful stories.  That is after all what you do:  Tell lies to get gullible people to invest in your free energy fantasy.

Or maybe Mike, Tom, Larry, mine and others telling you to stop ignoring the load was not realized.

Mondrasek set up his problem without an external load, claiming that he thought he got free energy even without one.  Once I showed him that was not so, then he came up with his load idea which still left his "ideal ZED" that you approved the fundamentally lossy machine that it is.  As I ahve repeatedly shown:  Larry and webby are just lost.

OK--- fine - do it now.
add a load and lift it and then tell me how much of the energy used to lift the load is consumed...
Well?

Are you asking me to alter your contraption?  LOL.

[MarkE]

You are A troll and a spammer.
What is your excuse for not asking ME or TK to explain why the input is not consumed - while performing work?

Probably because like most people who realize what is going on he knows you pose a meaningless question.    Your contraptions do not deliver output energy to a load.  They consume every bit of input energy that you supply to them causing them to run down and stop.

Using quotes out of context is not very honest is it?

Then you should stop doing such things.

p.s. I have answered those questions before - it does not make me a liar if you refuse to listen.
good day.
Oh Yeah - if TK Or ME explain why we can not use the energy input after performing external work - you can call me a fraud and liar - until then - you are the Troll...

Your claims to energy production are false.  Ergo no output in excess of input occurs.  Ergo given that you claim to produce excess output energy over input you are a liar.  Ergo given that you use those false claims to sell investments in a technology you know does not exist, you are a fraud.  QED.

[TinselKoala]

Still playing games.... well did I expect different.
You scammed people with your video - money was lost, until you repay the builders...
Your credibility is toast...
You make up crap to insult good men.
good day.

You still don't know the definition of SCAM, do you, and you still cannot provide any evidence whatsoever for your claims about "my video".... which you have never seen. All versions of "that video" that are on the internet are ALTERED and UNAUTHORIZED COPIES of the original video.

But it is not MY credibility that is under question here, honest Wayne Travis, it is YOURS. As I have noted before, even the lowest lying axe murderer can be perfectly correct when she points to the naked Emperor that you are.

You can try to divert attention from YOUR fraud all you like. Your diversions are irrelevant and only betray your own ignorance and your own inability to address the real issues: YOU ARE MAKING FALSE CLAIMS, you cannot support your claims with real data, and you HAVE TAKEN MONEY for your claims.

Now. Review the definition of "scam" :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confidence_trick
And note how it fits YOUR program exactly, but cannot be applied to anything that I have ever done or participated in.