Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

[mrwayne]

Now, I know this was confusing - or the trolls just tried to confuse everyone ---
When the ZED is receiving pressure and volume as an input - the head and air reacts in a serpentine manner - in an equal reaction resulting in vertically layered head Pressures, separated by vertically layered air pressure.
At the moment the Load is overcome - the external work is neutrally buoyant - any additional input continues to be stored as head and air columns - as the neutral load rises (resulting in external work).

The external load is removed - without allowing the pop up action ME added.
at this point - in simple English - the external work is stored - and the head and air pressure is recycled to another ZED system.
Chalk board - not yelling,
THIS UNIQUE ABILITY TO RECYCLE THE INPUT -CONTINUALLY REDUCES THE INPUT REQUIRED FOR EVERY STROKE -BOTH OF THE ZEDS.
THAT IS WHY WE PAIR THEM TOGETHER.

THIS IS A "SUPER CONSERVATIVE PROCESS" -
YES - THAT IS A NEW TERM - The ZED AND PROCESS IS A NEW DISCOVERY.
Got it?OK

[mrwayne]

It's silly to expect excess energy emerging from a sequence of lossy processes.
It's even sillier to expect such a thing to happen when the promoter of such a scheme acts like 'mrwayne' as documented in this thread.

Oh, let me direct you to our unique ability to hook lossy systems together to reduce input and increase efficiency.
Please read Larry's spread sheets............. It takes 16% of the energy required to come to buoyancy pressure - in a three layered dual ZED system versus a single column to the same head pressure.
Kind of makes it all possible...... thanks
Oh yes this is new - and no - no in the text books..
p.s. Buoyancy is pressure differential times surface area...... in simple terms...

[mrwayne]

Good night all.
Wayne

[orbut 3000]

 

Now, I know this was confusing - or the trolls just tried to confuse everyone ---
When the ZED is receiving pressure and volume as an input - the head and air reacts in a serpentine manner - in an equal reaction resulting in vertically layered head Pressures, separated by vertically layered air pressure.
At the moment the Load is overcome - the external work is neutrally buoyant - any additional input continues to be stored as head and air columns - as the neutral load rises (resulting in external work).

The external load is removed - without allowing the pop up action ME added.
at this point - in simple English - the external work is stored - and the head and air pressure is recycled to another ZED system.
Chalk board - not yelling,
THIS UNIQUE ABILITY TO RECYCLE THE INPUT -CONTINUALLY REDUCES THE INPUT REQUIRED FOR EVERY STROKE -BOTH OF THE ZEDS.
THAT IS WHY WE PAIR THEM TOGETHER.

THIS IS A "SUPER CONSERVATIVE PROCESS" -
YES - THAT IS A NEW TERM - The ZED AND PROCESS IS A NEW DISCOVERY.
Got it?OK

Still no clear proper description of your claimed anomaly or excess energy result.
Inventing new terms doesn't change the known and observable behavior of matter.
So your unproven and silly claims are still: Unproven and silly. Or, as most sane readers are undoubtedly forced to conclude, fraudulent.

[Pirate88179]

Hello Bill,
That was my mistake - I was meant Powercat...
I did take the time to go back and read your posts, and I read the many smart and funny insults...
But not what qualifies for a troll.
I believe everyone has a right to an opinion - good or bad.
You comments do not show intentional - fact altering - and diversion - claims such as MH, ME, TK, and the "Powercat"..
Those men have ruined this web site - and going unchecked has severely diminished readership,
Many reader followed our journey - from the initial release on Pens, Here, The smart scare crow,
and our web site.
I can rarely find a person who will return to this web site because of the blatant trolling.
Those four members - get their jollies at slander, diversion, and the unchecked ability to interrupt the discussion of a technology and have unchecked for over two years.
They pound out any scientific discussion, and revel when they frustrate a conversation between other members.
My apology for mixing you up with them - it was my clear error.
Wayne Travis

I accept the apology.

Thanks,

Bill