Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

Started by mondrasek, February 13, 2014, 09:17:30 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 60 Guests are viewing this topic.

Marsing

Quote from: MarkE on April 11, 2014, 06:09:31 AM
We is the scientific community.  We already have the descriptive terms:  conservative and non conservative.  Gravity only became described as conservative once many many efforts to show otherwise failed.  All someone has to do is reliably show that it is in fact not conservative under some set of circumstances and the global characterization of gravity as a conservative field will fall.  Sadly for Wayne and his cadre, they have no such evidence.

i see,    ;D ;D

mrwayne

Quote from: orbut 3000 on April 10, 2014, 10:31:31 PM





Still no clear proper description of your claimed anomaly or excess energy result.
Inventing new terms doesn't change the known and observable behavior of matter.
So your unproven and silly claims are still: Unproven and silly. Or, as most sane readers are undoubtedly forced to conclude, fraudulent.
Sure....... only insane people can see that a system that does not consume the input - which can then be reused - is a benefit.
OK.....

mrwayne

Quote from: orbut 3000 on April 10, 2014, 11:43:16 PM

Sorry,,, wayne.... I won't... read Larry's spread cheeks. Thanks.... Smile. ... p.s.
Why don't you express your thoughts in properly structured sentences? Your grammar is almost as insulting as your special branch of cartoon physics.
Look, if you have not figured out by now... you don't bother me lol.. good day

mrwayne

Quote from: TinselKoala on April 10, 2014, 11:55:59 PM
The load is overcome
the external work is neutrally buoyant
additional input continues to be stored
neutral load rises
resulting in external work


Gobbledegook. Neutrally buoyant external work. Rising neutral load. ADDITIONAL INPUT.  What a crock. Blah blah blah. Honest Wayne Travis can't explain what he doesn't have, so he tries the same "dazzle them with BS" tactic that has carried him through the past several years. It doesn't work here, though.
Gee that is scientific of you Troll...
Attack the person, insult the person, -- oh wait ---- that is what Trolls do....

MarkE

Quote from: mrwayne on April 11, 2014, 06:41:51 AM
Sure....... only insane people can see that a system that does not consume the input - which can then be reused - is a benefit.
OK.....
Unfortunately, for you: the fraud Wayne Travis, your worthless contraptions consume all of the input energy.  Contrary to your false claims they do not deliver any surplus output energy over and above the input energy.