Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

[MarkE]

Really, MarkE... for what benefit - you and the Trolls are the most blinded by prejudiced people I have ever meet in my life....
Almost everyone of our visiting Engineers had the same prejudice - and not one single engineer was "unable to cope with the facts"

LOL, so "almost everyone" are the "most blinded and prejudiced people" you have ever met?  Have you convinced anyone such as Mark Dansie or his team that your silly contraptions do what you claim?  I've never seen any such statement from any of them.

How possible does it hurt anyone to share my discovery???

You don't have a discovery. You are in the investment fraud business. [/quote]

Are you the conservative Law police?[/quote]LOL.

Let me remind you - the Law was written by men using sound judgment, science, and mathematics..... and it has evolved over and over as new discoveries have been made.
You are blessed to have been given the opportunity to share in the release of our Super conservative process..

I am blessed with the faculties to see through your incessant BS.

And you treat the discovery and those that understand it with Trolling Buffoonery

Once again:  You have no discovery.

Worst of all you make up crap to make yourself confident....

When all else fails as it very often does for you, you just lie.  Here that is again.

I care less if you like my words -

I think your words are awesome.  The way that you freely, effortlessly, and shamelessly tell lie after lie in advancement of your investment fraud is fantastic.

You should thank me for putting up with you and the puppets  attacks.....
WHO IS HURTING YOU OR ANYONE ELSE

You are a fraud stealing your investors' money.  You are definitely hurting them.

You fain that you are some hero trying to help innocent people from a fraud.... a portrait you painted...

"fain"  What's a fain Wayne?  I point out your fraud.  You don't like that.  That's tough Wayne.

You attack the innocent constantly - look in the mirror - that is what makes you a Troll.

Neither you nor those who support your fraud are innocent.

................
More importantly:
Prove your accusations...

I already have numerous times already.

How much of the input energy is still in the system after the Stroke and external load has been removed and the ZED not allowed to pop up?

You have yet to show any energy delivered to an external load.  Your stage props tilt and creak, sway and moan.  You've not shown that they perform any useful work.  And most of all you cannot show that they deliver any output energy in excess of the input energy.

Let me help you - how much energy was wasted when you popped up...??

No, all of your energy trying to argue your BS contraptions deliver free energy has been wasted.

That's right - most of it...
Now what is most important next step --- remove more energy to be able to sink...
OR REUSES ALL THAT ENERGY TO REDUCE THE OTHER ZED........
Now quick math - how much would have to be reused to make the other ZED SUPER CONSERVATIVE???
You would have capture enough to over come the losses in the transfer.... right?
Well would 50% be enough.... well it would if the ZEDs Ideal was only 50% efficient...
GEE, if we only were able to recapture 50% of the input, and were only able to design a buoyancy system that was 50% efficient - we could make unity....
But what if we could make a buoyancy device that is 51% efficient - or how about 99.9%
Or what if we could capture 51% of the reuse - or how about 75% of it??
........SUPER CONSERVATIVE APTLY DESCRIBES THE ABILITY TO USE AN INPUT MORE THAN ONCE...........
<<<AND THE CURRENT LAWS OF PHYSICS EXPLAINS THAT THE RESULT IS NET ENERGY>>>
It is so simple it boggles my mind that you can not get it.
Wayne

That's all wonderful bafflegab Wayne.  Unfortunately it has no physical meaning.  Your devices are energy roach motels.  Your business is an investment roach motel.

[mrwayne]

Really, Honest Wayne?

For our international readers, it is now 6:43 am in Chickasha OK USA, and it appears that honest Wayne Travis has gotten up early and made at least SIX forum posts arguing with internet trolls he does not respect.... BEFORE BREAKFAST.


The fellow has a serious problem.

Your fascination with my postings is pure scientific I am sure....
So TK, do you wish to redeem your self as an intelligent unbiased being....or continue to insult people....
Here is your chance....
If a system were able to reuse the same input to perform a second function - would that confirm to :
Two opposite and equal reactions.....
hypothetically of course...
Thanks

[mrwayne]

LOL, so "almost everyone" are the "most blinded and prejudiced people" you have ever met?  Have you convinced anyone such as Mark Dansie or his team that your silly contraptions do what you claim?  I've never seen any such statement from any of them.You don't have a discovery. You are in the investment fraud business.

Are you the conservative Law police?LOL.I am blessed with the faculties to see through your incessant BS.Once again:  You have no discovery.When all else fails as it very often does for you, you just lie.  Here that is again.I think your words are awesome.  The way that you freely, effortlessly, and shamelessly tell lie after lie in advancement of your investment fraud is fantastic.You are a fraud stealing your investors' money.  You are definitely hurting them."fain"  What's a fain Wayne?  I point out your fraud.  You don't like that.  That's tough Wayne.Neither you nor those who support your fraud are innocent.I already have numerous times already.You have yet to show any energy delivered to an external load.  Your stage props tilt and creak, sway and moan.  You've not shown that they perform any useful work.  And most of all you cannot show that they deliver any output energy in excess of the input energy.No, all of your energy trying to argue your BS contraptions deliver free energy has been wasted.That's all wonderful bafflegab Wayne.  Unfortunately it has no physical meaning.  Your devices are energy roach motels.  Your business is an investment roach motel.

Gee Mark -That is so desperate Mark...insult my words...... go on DIVERSION.
Do you know how much less effort it would be  to say - Gee Wayne - I get it now.....
MarkE
I waited for you to show how superior your math was than anyone else's in the world..
YOU HAVE NO EXCUSE -
Now put a load on the system and tell me how much of the input is still in the system after stroke - and then explain why it can not be reused?
until you do - your are the largest fraud and a Troll EVER....

[MarkE]

Now MarkE
I am receiving E-mails explaining that you are willfully ignorant...

Oh Wayne, I wouldn't concern myself with emails.  There are much more important documents you should concern yourself with receiving.

Why waste my time with a unapologetic liar?

He lives in your body.  What can you do?

Let me tell you and all why -------------------
Free energy, clean energy, energy security, and energy independence - is far more important than your Ego, and my time.

There it is:  Motherhood and apple pie!  Kiss the babies and the investor's money good bye![/quote]

Show where anyone has ever proven the ZED technology wrong -[/quote]Your claims are predicated on several false claims.  The simplest of which is that you have found a way to make gravity behave in a non-conservative way, and the boldest of which is that you can produce energy ex nihilo. Your claims are false.

You can't because MATH DOES NOT CARE ABOUT your vendetta.

Neither math nor physics bend to your fantastical lies Wayne.

Show it here now....my system - not the one you tired to invent with the weights going up and down, or the springs, or the dolls, or the unloaded system, or the bricks, or the unicorns....
Actually show that a ZED does not work.... You can not because you and the gang of four are just not powerful enough to change the physics...
Yeah - our system improves the understanding of physics -

No, your sad contraptions have done nothing to advance physics from where it was in the time of the Greeks.

That is why we get so much good help - first - we are not jerks to other people - second - we have the physical truth - and you have personal attacks..
and one more thing you need - admit when you are wrong - it builds character.

If you think stealing other people's money with your investment fraud doesn't make you a jerk, then you are free to do so.  Fraud you are, steal your investor's money with false claims you do.

[MarkE]

Your fascination with my postings is pure scientific I am sure....
So TK, do you wish to redeem your self as an intelligent unbiased being....or continue to insult people....
Here is your chance....
If a system were able to reuse the same input to perform a second function - would that confirm to :
Two opposite and equal reactions.....
hypothetically of course...
Thanks

Dear Mr. Fraud:  Your see-saws of silliness do not generate free energy.  Like any see-saw they dissipate energy supplied from the outside.