Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

[minnie]

    You can also recycle output, you missed it, you missed it, you missed it, you missed it!
    Problem for many is just what it is.
                    John

[MarkE]

Diversion...
Do you understand an NDA?
I am waiting for you to explain why we can not recycle the input......
Who actually avoids the facts?
That's right....... Trolls
Thanks

As predicted you can't find anyone with an actual technical reputation to vouch for you.  Sure Wayne, tell your silly story.  Everyone knows that no scientist would want to be associated with you, so of course they would demand you never disclose their association with your fraud.

[MarkE]

So you think the suppressors are the good guys? Makes sense considering your behavior.
Bad guy make free energy machine -- Bad man, bad man.....
Maybe you should down load mikes file and ask yourself a couple questions -
Such as gee how much energy is left in the system after the load is lifted, and how much does it cost to reset the system.....what could we do with this extra energy???
MH ....I am sorry in advance - you have treated a good man, machine, and team like crap..........
And if you are a good man at all - it will suck.. to be you...

Ah, we now enter the world of the fraud Wayne Travis': Wayne speak.  Bad guy:  That's you Wayne, sells fraudulent investment in non-existent free energy technology.

Mondrasek has yet to offer any claim for his proposed change. Gravity is still conservative with or without adding a static weight.

[powercat]

Name a single Ph.D. and/or professional engineer who endorses your fraud.  You won't and we all know why.

Wayne You Missed It Travis

MarkE ask you a simple question, Name a single Ph.D. and/or professional engineer who endorses your fraud.  You won't and we all know why.

Did you just miss the above question,  will RE Post it in bold (save you going back and looking for it)
Name a single Ph.D. and/or professional engineer who endorses your fraud.  You won't and we all know why.
There it is simple as simple is, in plain words on the page, but we know your answer will be nothing but excuses and insults.

[MarkE]

Wayne You Missed It Travis

MarkE ask you a simple question, Name a single Ph.D. and/or professional engineer who endorses your fraud.  You won't and we all know why.

Did you just miss the above question,  will RE Post it in bold (save you going back and looking for it)
Name a single Ph.D. and/or professional engineer who endorses your fraud.  You won't and we all know why.
There it is simple as simple is, in plain words on the page, but we know your answer will be nothing but excuses and insults.

The fraud Wayne Travis asserts that no Ph.D. or professional engineer will endorse his fraud.  He claims that there is no Ph.D. or professional engineer that will even allow them to invoke his name for fear they will sue him for damage caused them should he do so.  Does that sound like any of these supposed experts think they have latched onto a breakthrough in physics?  No, no, no, there isn't anyoe who wants to put their reputation on the line for the fraud: Wayne Travis.