Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

[mrwayne]

That's right Wayne Travesty, you are a liar and a fraud, everyone can see it, who is coming to your defence, after all these years who has used your simple science to construct a free energy device, not even your stooges can do that, you are a joke and a fraudulent liar

Do you feel better Powercatt..

I hope so..

You make assumptions on lack of information....

You will figure out that the Trolls Are left out of the real advances..

Why do you assume we would share information with you - with your utter unprofessional conduct..

Take Care

[mrwayne]

It is proven physics. No, you simply retold your lies.  Your system does not deliver net output energy in excess of input energy.The fraud: Wayne Travis once again attempts to deflect attention from his fraud and his lies by accusing others.

LOL you stick with your divisions...

Who has said that we defy Physics? You do.

You assume we must.... that is the limitation of your intellect.... not mine.

Take care,

Last day

[MarkE]

I guess this is what you were expecting then.

Since ST2 is restrained there is no energy increase to add, but in ST3 there is the increase in GPE which I have now added.

After that 1 additional change then I only need to add the return to ST1 and the performed.

st2 added energy                0.002098426553J
st2 estored total               0.005510745907J
st1 estored total               0.003412319354J
st3 estored total               0.003859752955J
ideal performed                 0.001650992951J
st3 to st1                      0.000447433601J
Performed Plus Return           0.002098426553J
st2 added energy                0.002098426553J
Input minus performed+return    0.000000000000J
st2 fill level                 37.00mm
lift height                     2.41mm

I added this to ST3_Energy

ST3_Riser_Weight_Energy     0.0002453J

=Riser3DownForce*ST3_Uplift_1*mm_to_m_1

I have not checked the numbers but the operations now look right.   Now, all someone has to do is find some way to recover the energy dumped with the bath water so to speak going from ST3 => ST1, only to immediately replace it going from ST1 => ST2.  Then one can contemplate why go all to this trouble when a cinder block brick that just sits there is more efficient.

[MarkE]

Do you feel better Powercatt..

I hope so..

You make assumptions on lack of information....

You will figure out that the Trolls Are left out of the real advances..

There it is:  The ever present, but false suggestion that there is something behind Wayne's tattered carnival curtain.  Unfortunately for the poor folks who already invested, there isn't and never was anything there.

Why do you assume we would share information with you - with your utter unprofessional conduct..

Take Care

Powercat has routinely reprinted your promises to demonstrate against your claims.  What you said you would do in 2012, you now say you will not do until late 2015.  The fact is that you never will demonstrate against your claims, because your claims are lies.

[MarkE]

LOL you stick with your divisions...

Who has said that we defy Physics? You do.

I never said such a thing.  I note that you falsely claim to violate known physics.  It is there to see on your web site and in your many writings, including posts here.

You assume we must.... that is the limitation of your intellect.... not mine.

Take care,

Last day

Oh goody, Wayne Travis the fraud will soon be gone for good ... until he comes back.