Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

[Pirate88179]

I did that in the first thread on this topic.  So this question has been answered by me already,, several times actually.

ummmm...No, you didn't because you can't.  Saying that you did does not make it true.

Oh, and that bumblebee story is, and has been a well known myth in science.  A myth is something that is not true.  Please do a little research and you will see this is correct.  I learned this way back in one of my college physics classes back in the 70's.

So, again I ask, where is all of this free work?  Since you can't answer this question I suppose it means that there is not any free work, which, is something we all knew all along.

Thanks for confirming this for the record.

Bill

[minnie]

  Not a good analogy. Everyone with any sense knew a bumblebee could fly, because they saw it.
  Now, show us a ZED working, or a perpetual fountain or waterfall and folk will start to believe!
  Buoyancy is extremely well understood, it is involved in the very deepest of the oceans to the
  limits of the atmosphere. People doing research in these areas have to work it out in advance
  and it seems to conform to what is known.
      The answer is simple, show working proof.
                                              John.

[MarkE]

Actually YOU need to show mine since YOU are making that claim about me.  I understand that reading comprehension may not be your strong point,, but "needs to be qualified" about sums it up there Mark.

Go look up argument from ignorance.

Here again you are making a false claim.

Evidence?  No you never have evidence.

You have inferred, and also ignored, that if it has not been observed then there is nothing to observe.

What "it"?  Something that is not evidenced does not weigh against that which has evidence. No one has shown any evidence in support of Wayne's claims.

That sounds like  YOU think YOU know all there is to know already.

You just keep going around in the same circles:  You want to believe something extraordinary so it is up to others to disprove it to your satisfaction.  Keep burying your head.  Keep playing the fool.  See where it gets you.

[MarkE]

I did that in the first thread on this topic.  So this question has been answered by me already,, several times actually.

I ahve never seen anywhere that you have shown evidence in support of Wayne's claims.  As to your own experiments, when I asked you for data, you said you lost your notebooks and could not provide it.

[Pirate88179]

I ahve never seen anywhere that you have shown evidence in support of Wayne's claims.  As to your own experiments, when I asked you for data, you said you lost your notebooks and could not provide it.

Mark:

Ah, the old "lost notebooks" ploy.  That is almost as good as the "I signed an NDA so I can't show any evidence" ploy.  Stefan should add a line to the TOS for this website that demands that anyone who makes a free energy claim must show proof, and NOT demand that others de-bunk it.  Otherwise, TK's unicorn in his backyard might be eligible for the OU prize.

Bill