Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


www.overunity-theory.de

Started by hartiberlin, April 15, 2005, 09:33:21 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.

hartiberlin

For all free energy and overunity related theory things,
have a look at my colleagues website from Wolf Dieter Bauer:

http://www.overunity-theory.de/
Stefan Hartmann, Moderator of the overunity.com forum

thomas

Dear Dr: Hartmann:

I am having difficiulty posting a topic on your website.

Regardless, I am looking for comments on one can overcome the 2nd law in in producing light at ambient temperature.

I am now convinced that the Kelvin-Planck statement of the 2nd law can be violated without violating the 2nd law itself.

You can get around the Kelvin-Planck statement if you can devise a process at ambient temperature that spontaneously produces a VUV photon from the ambient and at the same time drops the temperature to absolute zero. Here a VUV photon is equivalent to work because means can always be devised for the VUV photon to lift a weight. If so, the 2nd Law is not violated because work is produced in the heat exchange from the ambient reservoir and a reservoir at absolute zero.

One way of doing this is to place a number of atoms having thermal kT energy in a QED cavity having an EM resonance in the VUV. At ambient temperature, the atoms emit in the IR. But in the VUV resonant QED cavity, the IR radiation is suppressed.? Suppressed IR radiation means the temperature T tends to absolute zero. But you still have to conserve the EM radiation loss by suppression of IR by a gain elsewhere.? The only place the EM enrgy can be gained is at the resonant VUV frequency of the QED cavity. So the VUV photon is produced spontaneously, that in turn, can produce visible light by photoluminescence.

But you don't have to put the atom in the QED cavity.? You simply make a QED cavity, say a nanoscale spherical cavity, so that the atoms at ambient temperature in the inside surface are within the extent of the QED cavity. This is the familiar penetration depth of the VUV wave that spontaneously stands across the QED cavity.

The process continues because the QED cavity inside surface at absolute zero is lower than the outer surface at ambient temperture, and therefore heat flows into the cold surface. But the temperature is forbidden to rise on the inside surface because the IR radiation associated with the rise in temperature is suppressed.

The file is located at:? ?www.geocities.com/sonoluminescence2005/Light.PDF

I would appreciate your comments.


Sincerely,

Daniel Jackson

Hello

I am greatly interested in the ideas of over unity. 
Yet, what is over unity? 
Is it based upon the sum of all energies? 
Or only those enegries doing work?

What if we use a far field force to move mass elsewhere,
and we do not phyically use the mass generating the force?
An electron exerts that kind of force.
Why not use it that way?

Let me explain. 
If I use an electrical charge such as we have in a battery,
to move another charge elsewhere into current flow. 
And that moving charge is doing work. 
Then that means that my charge I am using
for the force to move the working electrical current
is only suppling force and
not being physically used as the energizing charge itself. 
The stored charge supplying the force
is only being used for its field forces and
not as the moving source of electrons. 
Hence since this charge is used for force on other charges
to move them and is not being physically used,
...then I would not be depleting my energizing charge.

In this scenario I have described an over unity electrical device.

I suppose this might sound theoretical. 
Yet I suspect it boils down to a simple circuit.

Let me see if you are interested in knowing more here. 
If you are then download the attached pdf
and then you all come back after awhile
...and tell everyone about what you learned.

Daniel Jackson @ the gate!