Acoustic magnetic generator.

[synchro1]

@Tinselkoala,


The 8 khz beat frequency where the barrium ferrite magnet emits an audible ring is exactly a 10 bi-multiple of the 7.83 hrz Shumman constant. Anyone who has seen the Marcos -Dancing Magnets- video can witness the exagerated oscillation at 7.8 hrz. The 174 khz is a 7.83 bi-mutiple of 22. This is a resonant frequency common to all magnets, regardless of the magnetized element. You maintained the increased oscillation in the Marcos video at 7.8 hrz was a coincidence. How do you account for these additional 7.8 hrz correspondences ?

[synchro1]

Tinselkoala has apparently chosen to ignore the  challenge to explain why 7.8 kHz pulse has an increased oscillation effect on the Marcos dancing magnets and also at times 2 to the 10th power, an audible ring. This amounts to not one coincidence as he falsely maintains , but two! 

The evidence of a constant oscillating frequency is magnetisem is more convincing when viewed by the Pergallosi video of Charrier type oscillation and the perpetual pendulum effect demonstrated by Dr. Stiffler.

Tinselkoala has steadfastly maintained that Shumman, Wooten, Marcos, Pergallosi and Stiffler are all demonstrating somekind of bogus effect, not a constant oscillating frequency of magnetisem. Some kind of product from his BS Factory.   

[MasterPlaster]

You all need to read this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barium_titanate

[Bruce_TPU]

@Tinselkoala,


The 8 khz beat frequency where the barrium ferrite magnet emits an audible ring is exactly a 10 bi-multiple of the 7.83 hrz Shumman constant. Anyone who has seen the Marcos -Dancing Magnets- video can witness the exagerated oscillation at 7.8 hrz. The 174 khz is a 7.83 bi-mutiple of 22. This is a resonant frequency common to all magnets, regardless of the magnetized element. You maintained the increased oscillation in the Marcos video at 7.8 hrz was a coincidence. How do you account for these additional 7.8 hrz correspondences ?

Hello Synchro,

You are ABSOLUTELY correct!   

The following is what I'd like you to do, and it is further proof of the Schumann's interaction...

Starting with 8000 hz form a geometric progression table.  8000 / 2 is 4000.  4000/ 2 is 2000, etc, all the way to the Schumann's.

Next take 8000 and x2 is 16000 hz, on up, etc.

now, using the FFT function of your scope, look at how many harmonic peaks MATCH your geometric progression table. 

I have done so with tpu collector I am working on and you will be amazed.

YES these earth magnetic standing wave CAN have a direct influence.

Good work,

Bruce

[Turbo]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XghAn9olnsI
Tinselkoala has steadfastly maintained that Shumman, Wooten, Marcos, Pergallosi and Stiffler are all demonstrating somekind of bogus effect, not a constant oscillating frequency of magnetisem. Some kind of product from his BS Factory.   

Don't you forget the wonderfull work done by Mr Jerry Bales.
He confirmed the effect in a different setup with rotating disks in stead of using a pulsed field and it exactly shows the same behaviour.
This seems to be important because it rules out false readings due to inductive coil collapse and or switching noise spikes and etc. generating unwanted frequency's that might interferere with final readings.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4l_O8vfyRu0

I am glad to see that there are still people that do not take other's (pre-historic) words just for granted.
I have had it happen so many times i believed someone for a long time untill the day came experiments showed it all to be entirely different.
So i changed from listening to other to seeing is believing.