Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Acoustic magnetic generator.

Started by synchro1, February 15, 2014, 06:07:02 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

MileHigh

The last few postings consist of the usual Synchro1 fantasy nonsense talk with some cheerleading and I am here to bring some balance to the discussion.

There is no Schumann resonance anything to worry about when you work on an electronic circuit or play with magnets on your bench.  There are no Schumann effects at all on this scale.  It's simply a ridiculous idea.  If you disagree make a case with a logical argument.

Likewise, there is no such thing as a resonance frequency for a magnet.  It's another ridiculous idea.  If you disagree make a case with a logical argument.

This is nothing more than leading yourselves down a garden path of your own making like you are writers for your own low-budget science fiction movie.  It's an insult to science and engineering and also to the legitimate researchers around here to hear this fantasy nonsense talk all the time.

Again, if you disagree with me make a case with a logical argument.

MileHigh

Turbo

Like i said just ignore the naysayers and do your own research.
You will find it yourself.

Seeing is believing and you don't need to prove anything to anybody so just ignore them.

verpies

Quote from: MileHigh on March 02, 2014, 01:20:05 AM
Likewise, there is no such thing as a resonance frequency for a magnet.  It's another ridiculous idea.  If you disagree make a case with a logical argument.
I'm all for logical arguments.  Let's take a NdFeB magnet as an example:

Over 20% of naturally occurring Neodymium and 2%  of naturally occurring Iron and 100% of Boron have non-zero nuclear magnetic moments, thus their nuclei will resonate at 2.31MHz/T and 1.38MHz/T and 13.66MHz/T, respectively, for the most common isotopes.

These resonances can be invoked by time varying magnetic fields (NMR) or acoustic vibrations of the magnet (NAR).

Also, a rod shaped magnet will support specific acoustic standing wave frequencies inversely proportional to the rod's length.
The Villari effect might influence the magnetic properties of a magnet, especially when acoustic standing waves are formed inside it.

I'm not stating that Out/In power ratio > 1 can be achieved in devices excited by these magnetic or acoustic resonance frequencies, but I think it is incorrect to state, that "there is no such thing as a resonance frequency for a magnet".

synchro1

Quote from: MileHigh on March 02, 2014, 01:20:05 AM
The last few postings consist of the usual Synchro1 fantasy nonsense talk with some cheerleading and I am here to bring some balance to the discussion.

There is no Schumann resonance anything to worry about when you work on an electronic circuit or play with magnets on your bench.  There are no Schumann effects at all on this scale.  It's simply a ridiculous idea.  If you disagree make a case with a logical argument.

Likewise, there is no such thing as a resonance frequency for a magnet.  It's another ridiculous idea.  If you disagree make a case with a logical argument.

This is nothing more than leading yourselves down a garden path of your own making like you are writers for your own low-budget science fiction movie.  It's an insult to science and engineering and also to the legitimate researchers around here to hear this fantasy nonsense talk all the time.

Again, if you disagree with me make a case with a logical argument.

MileHigh
Quote from Jerry Baylis,

Magnetic standing wave around two variable speed disk magnets resonates with two small 'balance' magnets at the Schumann frequency (7.834 Hz).

Milehigh,

Your crass comparisons of me to a cheerleader and director of nonsensical low budget science fiction movies is just more exhaust from a head held to a tire inflation hose. You pressured Conradelektro into trivializing his flutter discovery with my Synchro Coil. You are nothing more than a petro scoundrel.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mUJza3l8rmU

After viewing this video, imagine wrapping the oscillating toroid magnets with copper wire output coils. The experimentor has assured us a constant input power was applied for each frequency. Where would the magnets generate the most output?
The magnet core coil Conradelektro began to experiment with has a máximum output frequency as well. This peak ouput range is not imaginary and corresponds to the 7.83 hrz Shumman constant along with the Marcos dancing magnets and the Jerry Baylis example.

Think about the implications of this! This is a very important discovery, and should not be unduly discredited.

verpies

The only implication of this experiment is that the magneto-mechanical resonance of this particular magnet arrangement is 7.8Hz.
The laws of Newton an Gauss predict that with larger magnets this resonance frequency would be lower and with smaller magnets - higher. 
The opposite is true in reference to the magnetic flux density gradient of those magnets.

So far this phenomenon has a very high yawn factor and does not prove in any way that the 7.8Hz frequency is special universally.