Is this the same? Gundersons Solid State Electric Generator Patent

[Liberty]

I wonder if permanent magnet high density flux saturation levels of the core, interferes with the more powerful operation of the Gunderson Solid State Electric Generator?  (It is my understanding that it so far works at low power levels).  I would guess that core saturation might be a limiting issue in attempted higher magnetic strength and power models because of the limit of saturation in a magnetic core.  I hope not, but as I think about it, I would wonder about that being an unfortunate limitation of the design???  Maybe Overtone would be able to speak about this, whether it is an issue, and if not, how it can be avoided?  Perhaps the core material that is used is key here or just make the core very large and laminate the core using silicon steel?

[Overtone]

Sorry, as I have mentioned, I cannot comment on proprietary technology issues.

All will be revealed when the final Patent documents covering this invention are published.

[JackFrost]

Hello Mark,

How is the validation coming along?

JackFrost

[Overtone]

Hi Jack,

We have two devices that may prove out in the rotary lab and two in the solid-state lab, with the possibility of one more in each.

Progress is slower than we would like, but continues.  Part of what slows us down is the continuing shortage of working capital, ironically, that will end with validation. 

There is also some wonderful and important new work, which interferes with attempts to schedule, as it represents insights that can help with several of the future commercial and demo machines.  Invention does not lend itself to a rigid schedule.

Finally, EarthTech has relocated in Austin and coordinating visits may prove a bit of a challenge. 

My present guess is we will end up with it all done sometime next month. 

[JackFrost]

Mark,

If evaluation will cure the working capital issue then I suggest focusing on the single device that can be produced most expediently and with  the greatest chance of initial success rather than several devices.  You risk having multiple incomplete devices, no evaluations, and no capital.  The longer it takes - the more it take - monitarily that is.

You stated before that you have a working prototype (when the patent application was filed) - take it to Austin.  Like LTSeung888 mentioned - Steorn forced their hand and they have to move much faster than anticipated - you do too.

Also, send this link to Cyril:
http://www.physics.ucla.edu/demoweb/demomanual/electricity_and_magnetism/electrodynamics/vector_potential.html

If the deflection of the galvanometer isn't A-Field induction, then what is it?