Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[MileHigh]

Finally....

Here is another way of looking at it:

Setup with exciter coil:   The exciter coil provides 100 units of power.  The LC resonator burns off 20 units of power to sustain the resonance where the power is burnt off in the resistance of the wires and in core losses.  80 units of power flow into the secondary coil.  5 units of power are burnt of in the wire resistance of the secondary coil.  75 units of power are transfered into the load.  So the system is 75% efficient.

Setup with spinning rotor:  100 units of power are provided to the motor.  5 units of power are burnt off in the coils of the motor and 95 units of mechanical power are supplied to the rotor.  The rotor coupling to the QEG is vastly inferior to the the exciter coil coupling to the core in the previous example.  Let's say we lose 40 units of power because of the poor coupling and I don't know exactly where it goes, so let's just say it goes into a "power sinkhole."  (Note there is likely a lot of flux self-cancellation going on which translates into excessive resistive losses in the two primary coils.)  So you are left with 55 units of power to feed to the primary coils.  In the chain of [primary coils] -> [through the spinning rotor] -> [secondary coils] -> [load] you lose another 20 units of power so that only 35 units of power go to the load.  So the system is 35% efficient.

Very simple hypothetical example:

With exciter coil:   You have magnetic power (changing flux) supplied by the primary that flows into the secondary to drive a load.

With spinning rotor:  You have magnetic power (changing flux) supplied by the primary that flows into two places at the same time.  Part of the magnetic power is rerouted and travels through the spinning rotor and part of the magnetic power goes into the secondary to drive a load.

So in the second case, some of the flux gets "stolen" by the flux rerouting process and less goes to the secondary coil.

Here is the key point:  The secondary coil doesn't care about the missing flux and will still do exactly what it is supposed to do and act like a normal secondary of a transformer, but with less flux.

This whole "flux rerouting game" along with the "mechanical flux stimulus" in the QEG is just a form of "eye candy for the brain."  It doesn't actually do anything significant.  All of the coils in the system will still act like conventional coils.  If you are going to use a mechanical source of power to pump power through the QEG so that the power ends up driving a load, then you will have to supply torque no matter what, and that is the Lenz drag from the QEG.  The more power you pump into the load, the more Lenz drag there will be.

Nothing unconventional is happening in the QEG.  Every single component that makes up the QEG acts conventionally and all of the components working together act conventionally.  This highly unusual architecture of the QEG is just a "smoke screen" to make you believe that it is an "unconventional generator with parametric coupling and no Lenz drag."  There is not a chance in hell that that is true and the data will clearly prove what I am saying is true.

MileHigh

[MileHigh]

F_Brown,

Note when I did the simple power analysis for the most recent clip where they claim over unity it is presumed to be all based on measurements of the secondary coil output.  The 35% efficiency is not "imaginary" efficiency.  The assumption is that the power factor is very very close to one when driving the light bulb load at the relatively low frequency of operation.

With respect to the efficiency of different replications, based on the data that we have seen so far, I doubt that we will see efficiencies of greater than 40% and I would be very surprised if we see efficiencies above 50%.

I am basing my comments on seeing properly presented clips with current and voltage scoped for the load and a Kill-a-Watt meter on the drive motor.  Even though the "over unity" clip was done on the fly and was not a serious presentation of input and output power measurements, I think it's the best data we have seen so far.  I know there has been anecdotal claims of higher efficiencies, but nothing with scope shots and Kill-a-Watt readings.

MileHigh

[MileHigh]

Bad news.  HopeGirl is using the alleged "over unity" clip that is actually under unity to solicit funds.  It's simply unethical behaviour.

MileHigh

http://www.gofundme.com/HopeGirlFixtheworldQEG

[TinselKoala]

That is outrageous.

And that's just ONE of her funding sites. They have collected well over a hundred thousand dollars based on this ridiculous claim of having an overunity machine that they don't actually have. Teaching people how to make something they can't make themselves! Showing "overunity" that depends on a hodgepodge set of numbers from abused oscilloscopes.... and can't be demonstrated in any other way.

Well fine, people, if you are happy with overunity that can't actually do anything but make squiggly lines on an expensive digital Etch-a-Sketch... send her more money!

And just keep ignoring people like MileHigh and little old me, who are trying to save you your money so you can spend it on something worthwhile, instead of funding a worldwide vacation for these QEG liars.

[ACG]

That is outrageous.

And that's just ONE of her funding sites. They have collected well over a hundred thousand dollars based on this ridiculous claim of having an overunity machine that they don't actually have. Teaching people how to make something they can't make themselves! Showing "overunity" that depends on a hodgepodge set of numbers from abused oscilloscopes.... and can't be demonstrated in any other way.

Well fine, people, if you are happy with overunity that can't actually do anything but make squiggly lines on an expensive digital Etch-a-Sketch... send her more money!

And just keep ignoring people like MileHigh and little old me, who are trying to save you your money so you can spend it on something worthwhile, instead of funding a worldwide vacation for these QEG liars.

Great post about loads and power.  See the new monies coming in to the crow funding after that latest video?
I said from day one, this will play out for years as I referenced Keshe. Just you wait and see the response to people politely asking honest questions of how the calculations were made. This is going to be a long ride. Now in full run away mode. No one at the controls.

I am now selling over unity light bulbs:
When I put a scope on a 120v 100W light bulb the reading of Vpp is approximately 330v with 2.3 App.  330 x 2.3 is 759W.
My over unity bulb draws 760W from the wall!!!
Get this, the power company only charges for 100 Watts!!!
California Has Over Unity!!!