Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[memoryman]

Thanks for preciding your point of view.

Well, if you did see the rms values it is just because you didn't study the report.

And the claim is not conventional for now, as it is ratio between AVRs output under Real Power consumption, and the VARs go up to 2.05 kVARs rms (see report on the blog after the vid).

But as this very specific claim, the values looks perfectly in agreement and the orders of magnitude too great to be just false reading, imho.

So 2.000 / 600 = "COP"* 30.0.

*: the " " are very intended. COPs are one of my specialities in energetic engineering.

2,000/600= 3.333, not 30. "COPs are one of my specialities in energetic engineering" maybe not.
I did NOT see rms values, but should have.
The VARs are immaterial; the only real power is < 300W.

[Angelic]

Yes it would be great to see the QEG self looped. But that is not going to happen. My hope is that now they will move forward and attempt the self looping. It will be very interesting to see how this is done.

[Rigel4]

I would like to see the self looped operation that she seems to claim they've achieved.

Well what are you wait'n for close your eyes click you heels.

[SeaMonkey]

In the most recent video James mentions that there
are three resonances in certain configurations but
that only one is "phase locked."

In the demonstration as he is adjusting the Variac
to bring the motor up to speed it appears that one
resonance point is briefly transitioned through as
the lamps flash momentarily before the resonance
lock occurs, with its characteristic sound, where the
lamps once again illuminate steadily.

Have the other resonances been explored to see
what their characteristics are?  It is possible that
their present efforts may be focused on the wrong
resonance.  Or that the other resonances may have
a critical relationship which is being missed.

[ACG]

Thanks for preciding your point of view.

Well, if you did see the rms values it is just because you didn't study the report.

And the claim is not conventional for now, as it is ratio between AVRs output under Real Power consumption, and the VARs go up to 2.05 kVARs rms (see report on the blog after the vid).

But as this very specific claim, the values looks perfectly in agreement and the orders of magnitude too great to be just false reading, imho.

So 2.000 / 600 = "COP"* 30.0.

*: the " " are very intended. COPs are one of my specialities in energetic engineering.

In a way you are correct.  The measurements appear valid.  To date, I have yet to read anyone question the measurements.  You see, the error is in the interpretation.  The calculations is what is being questioned.  Earlier peak to peaks were announced as the output power.  Should have not be calculated that way.  Or should have used peak to peak for the input.  Now reactive power is being used.  Either method is good for keeping the ball rolling.  The donations soar after the word is out using incorrect interpretations of power.  When you dabble with reactive power you better make it very clear on your calculations and show every phase angle power factor product each step of the way, which by the way no such effort in the report shown.  And as seen on the report and video, the phase angle is very high resulting in much lower true power.