Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[PCB]

Thanks, I'll make some wording changes to highlight the stored energy issue of the resonant circuit.

[PCB]

Updated response:

Steman - Very good question. VAR is the measurement unit for reactive or as we often call it in the UK "imaginary" power. The words "real" and "imaginary" come from complex number notation. The power used to light say a light bulb is referred to as "true" or "real" power and is measured in Watts. Real power can be used to do work like drive a motor or other load. Imaginary power can not be used to do work. It's main value to power generation companies is to maintain the correct end customer voltage levels on the national grid when you have inductive loads like refrigerators, motors, and other devices where you do not have unity power factor.


There is a third type of power referred to as apparent or "complex" power and is measured in Volt Amps (VA). It is the vector sum of the "real" and "imaginary" power vectors. You might find this article useful:


http://www.aspowertechnologies.com/resources/pdf/True%20vs.%20Apparent%20Power.pdf


Another way to look at VARs in the case of the QEG, is that it represents the stored energy in the primary tank circuit. The VAR is the energy that flows between the inductance of the primary coil and the capacitor bank. A key feature of resonant circuits is that they can build up large amounts of energy from little amounts over an extended period of time. These little amount of energy likely come from the change in reluctance of the the core due to the spinning rotor. However, you can not take out more energy than you put in - so the device will never put out more power than you put in and we see this in the efficiency numbers that Jamie has so far presented. In addition if you attempt to take out the energy then you will disrupt the resonant circuit and it will stop working.


Unfortunately it is not possible either to convert imaginary power (VAR) into real power (Watts). This is because the average reactive power is always zero. So the QEG producing 20 KVAR in the primary coil is not particularly useful. Also when you calculate the efficiency of a device like the QEG you can not divide the imaginary power by the real power. So you can not do this 20000/600 = 33.33 overunity.

[F_Brown]

@FBrown
Thanks, i will try your setup!
No problem to get V14, but i don't now if i may put à torrent link on this threads!
But i will send you a link, if you send me your address by private mail
@+

To get the spice model to run you may have to copy the symbol "three_port.asy" into the ".../LTC/LTspiceIV/lib/sym/Misc" folder.

[ACG]

My response to a question on http://be-do.com/index.php/en/forum/qeg-general-topics/451-please-explain-what-does-var-mean#2007



Let me know if I should make any editorial changes?

Good effort.  I cannot wait to see the replies.  I noticed you have thank you's and a few post but 0 karma over at be-do.  By the way how does the karma work over there?  The admins decide who they like or some grand formulation like a FICO score?  Could not find it anywhere and when reading the registration guidelines I do completely agree with the first sentence "Tesla technology already exists, has for over a century and it's just a matter of time, conscious intention, inspired creativity, some hard work and dedication from people all over the world before we having working units in homes and business."  Yes, Tesla technology does exist.  Its not a matter of time.  We have motors and power transmission world wide.  What does that have to do with any qeg?

I have been using the water method:
Reactive is simply then energy from the source to the load that did not make it to the load. Sort of like passing buckets of water from one water well to another well. Some of it get spilled and the spilled water runs back to the source well. But for electricity instead of being spilled it is returned to the source. Problem is the source then needs to put out more energy to fully power the load. None of this is extra power by means of reactivity. The coils of motors cause this reactivity.

[MileHigh]

PCB:

You never know, I don't want to prejudge, but there is a possibility that Larry's eyes glaze over when he reads your posting.  So he might not be aware that it is a "bad" posting and you squeeze by!

I laugh, because I just invented the "Boing!" test.  See the attached image...

Now, what percentage of QEG enthusiasts can describe what happens in the "Boing!" test?  And by that I mean the energy dynamics and the energy audit trail in time and space.  How many can "see" why, how, when, and where the energy is going when you do a Boing!?

If you can't pass the "Boing!" test then how can you build and analyze a QEG?  Chanting Boings! in harmony with a syncopated beat does not get you any points.

MileHigh