Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[MileHigh]

to Dieter
In a way your right,too many people being hyper critical,too many hard line skeptics.
You do need a mix of skeptics and believers,if you have too many believers then
you get fairy dust and magic,
too many hard line skeptics and you destroy all creativity.
Right now a thinning of the herd is needed(hard line skeptics),Stefan
needs to ban some hard line skeptics.If I don't like what someone
says I seemly ignore it,when a roving mad dog skeptic comes into a conversation,where
he wasn't addressed ,pushing hes belief that a device is fake on me,yet can't show that it
is fake, by any way ,forcing there beliefs on me,then its time for Stefan to thin the herd.
I suggest starting a new post on which hard-line skeptics,Stefan should ban and why and vote on who should go,
then present it to Stefan.I suggest leaving one hard-line skeptic,my suggestion is leaving milehigh out of the list to ban.
but banning the others.They will of course be back,but they will get the point,if not the process can be repeated.
There are a lot of moderate skeptics in here I have no problem with them

Why don't you get out the skull measurement callipers while you are at it?

[MileHigh]

to Dieter
In a way your right,too many people being hyper critical,too many hard line skeptics.
You do need a mix of skeptics and believers,if you have too many believers then
you get fairy dust and magic,
too many hard line skeptics and you destroy all creativity.
Right now a thinning of the herd is needed(hard line skeptics),Stefan
needs to ban some hard line skeptics.If I don't like what someone
says I seemly ignore it,when a roving mad dog skeptic comes into a conversation,where
he wasn't addressed ,pushing hes belief that a device is fake on me,yet can't show that it
is fake, by any way ,forcing there beliefs on me,then its time for Stefan to thin the herd.
I suggest starting a new post on which hard-line skeptics,Stefan should ban and why and vote on who should go,
then present it to Stefan.I suggest leaving one hard-line skeptic,my suggestion is leaving milehigh out of the list to ban.
but banning the others.They will of course be back,but they will get the point,if not the process can be repeated.
There are a lot of moderate skeptics in here I have no problem with them

Hi dieter ,thanks for sharing.
To answer your question, at the end of the day, when all is said and done, they can't stay away because of fear.
Love never says the ends justify the means, only fear does that, in all its manifestations.
And the rest are just effects or the nuts and bolts.
If one does not grasp what i just said, then it is pointless discussing further, as explaining by the effects, will literally go over ones head.
Meaning, if one is polarized by fear, unconditional loving ways of living will not compute.
Some may know of Einstein, he said something like, the same thinking that caused a problem, cannot the solve the problem.
It really is a matter of one or the masses consciousness state, or some call spirituality.
It's a process to change embedded ways, similar to a freight train, takes time to slow, stop and then go in another direction, especially if people and groups are actively, with all their might, trying to keep that train from slowing and reversing.
peace love light and much wisdom on our journeys

Cheappower2012, are you just a sockpuppet for Skywatcher123?   i.e.; Tyson?

It sure as hell looks like it.   If it is indeed the case, we have the "peace, love, and light" flower child talking to a fascist like it's just normal.  Then the groovy peace-loving guy steps into his big sock puppet and comes back and also sounds like a fascist.

How about them apples?

[memoryman]

Hard line skeptics are that way for a good reason: they have seen the false claims too many times.
What Steve Spisak proposes is impossible and comes from a lack of understanding of elementary physics: gearing does not produce more energy out than in; otherwise you automobile transmission or bicycle gearing would be an OU device!
You do the same to skeptics what many skeptics do to 'true believers' : label them all the same.

[sarkeizen]

to Dieter
There are a lot of moderate skeptics in here I have no problem with them

So what is a moderate skeptic?  Someone who only thinks evidence and reason should drive decisions...sometimes?  Which times?

I suggest to you that what you think of as people being extra hard on you.  Is exactly the reaction that anyone would respond with when someone tries to peddle nonsense.  Think about it.  If I told you I had a magic knife which you could safely shove in your throat without harm.    Do you think you would be willing to let that go?  What if i tried to convince other people?  What if I held conferences and workshops teaching people how to make their own magic knives.  Would you let that stand?

To me, this is exactly the level of plausibility most of you are selling and watching you all chit-chat about how to best make a magic knife without actually entertaining the idea that the most likely case is that there IS NO SUCH THING AS MAGIC KNIVES is both amusing and sad.  Not to mention how many of you have sealed your ideas about magic knives up in little boxes where nobody is allowed to tell you that your ideas are bullshit and your observations are more likely delusions.

One might argue that compared to the magic knives, OU research is harmless.  I might argue that point but even if you're right all you're saying it's it's ok to delude yourself and deceive others as long as you think the cost is small.

[Rigel4]

Banning people that do not agree with you is not the way to go. While I am a new here at OU I have been posting for 4-5 years related to OU. To all the folks that want banning over the ignore feature,  is that you want? a heavy hand? We need open discussion without the FU. If anything we should stop the tongue-n-cheek  kindness that is really meant as a FU also.

Having a paypal button does not mean much to me. Saying you have something you don't and soliciting money on  "proven" false promises is another thing. I have offered to help others in the past, even if it did not pan out, but it's in everyone's interest to keep the discussion honest and educational.