Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[Farmhand]

Farmhand,  of course there is a point that has no opposition.  It surely could be when the movement of both the negative going energies and the positive going energies are balanced.  Then there would NOT be forces causing "Ringing or Back EMF" seeking to balance (due to it already being in balance).  Thank you for that insert from Tesla.  You found a one KEY..




Richard Williams  (NOT HopeGirl) and WE are all another part of Hope.

Oh but there is resistance in the DC resistance of the wires, determining the actual utilized output energy compared to the actual input energy is all that matters. The oscillating power is just a side show, which needs to be known only for the purposes of circuit design ect.

Inductive reactance does not consume energy, it restricts it. It can restrict input and/or output depending on the device and the load.

Nor does counter emf consume energy. ie. if we apply a capacitor charged to 20 volts to a 12 volt battery then we are only really applying 8 volts potential difference to the battery due to the counter emf of 12 volts that the battery possesses, however the capacitor ends up charged to 12 volts not 0 volts so the potential equal to the counter emf is not consumed, it's just a kind of offset to get to the point where a potential difference will happen if more voltage is given to the cap.

Similarly when a transformer sees a high counter emf at idle the input is small, then when loaded the transformer sees less counter emf which allows more current to flow and the transfer of energy happens. If counter emf consumed energy the transformer would use more at idle when the counter emf is high. But it doesn't the counter emf restricts the current and power and saves energy.

..

[MileHigh]

So what happens when you have an ideal battery at 12 volts, and you connect an ideal capacitor charged to 20 volts to the battery?

[MarkE]

In correlation to this non opposition key would be a PMH.  Where as when making the PMH (closing the keeper or creating the magnetics) the circuit is complete and the charge placed in the PMH is pure (balanced).  This is why it keeps the charge undiminished.   So the closer to perfect balance we tune a circuit the less waste from opposition there is. 


And MarkE this is the proof you asked for, when we learn to balance all forces flows and ebbs (in a open circuit) then we can null opposition.
Maybe that is a new definition for COP at 100%,  now learning to bump that bloch of perfect balance is where COP>1.

You can make all the unilateral declarations that you want.  You have not made and cannot make a self running machine much less one that self runs and delivers surplus energy.  You have repeatedly demonstrated your inability to deliver on your blatantly false claims.

[Farmhand]

So what happens when you have an ideal battery at 12 volts, and you connect an ideal capacitor charged to 20 volts to the battery?

Not a whole lot.

My observations tell me that with real components the voltages equalize and some energy is transferred from the capacitor to the battery and it gains some charge, some energy is lost and some energy remains as charge in the capacitor. Not sure if I can be any more vague than that. 


Give me a minute I'll see if I can work out a better answer.
..

[verpies]

@MarkE

So what is your answer to the venerable question, now?

Q: "A magnet is pulled out of a shorted superconducting aircoil.  Does the magnitude of the final current induced in that coil depend on how quickly the magnet is pulled out ?".