Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[markdansie]

I called this a scam some weeks ago and no amount of discussion or debate will make this work. I look back at some of the commentators here on past projects trying to defend the impossible. Look at the past..100% failure rate. No harm in trying but in this case someone is cashing in on misrepresenting the truth. My heart goes out to the good people in Taiwan and Morocco that had their hopes built up but people profiteering on false information and promise. Hopegirl is an opportunist lowlife.
How many times have we seen this before and over how many years?
This whole episode is sad and preys on vulnerable people with good intentions.
James need to step up and take some responsibility rather than pandering his ego (and no doubt bank account) as the leader of a new cult. I think the word arsehole would not be out of order. "Show me the data James"
Mark Dansie

[Pirate88179]

I called this a scam some weeks ago and no amount of discussion or debate will make this work. I look back at some of the commentators here on past projects trying to defend the impossible. Look at the past..100% failure rate. No harm in trying but in this case someone is cashing in on misrepresenting the truth. My heart goes out to the good people in Taiwan and Morocco that had their hopes built up but people profiteering on false information and promise. Hopegirl is an opportunist lowlife.
How many times have we seen this before and over how many years?
This whole episode is sad and preys on vulnerable people with good intentions.
James need to step up and take some responsibility rather than pandering his ego (and no doubt bank account) as the leader of a new cult. I think the word arsehole would not be out of order. "Show me the data James"
Mark Dansie

So, I suppose she should have called herself FalseHopeGirl then? (Grin)

I will never figure out why folks do such things...greed and ego I guess.

Bill

[MarkE]

@MarkE

So what is your answer to the venerable question, now?

Q: "A magnet is pulled out of a shorted superconducting aircoil.  Does the magnitude of the final current induced in that coil depend on how quickly the magnet is pulled out ?".

Asked and answered multiple times now.

[Hope]

You can make all the unilateral declarations that you want.  You have not made and cannot make a self running machine much less one that self runs and delivers surplus energy.  You have repeatedly demonstrated your inability to deliver on your blatantly false claims.

Yes MarkE still trying as we all are,  hope to see your working device soon as well.  Have a good one!

[Hope]

Oh but there is resistance in the DC resistance of the wires, determining the actual utilized output energy compared to the actual input energy is all that matters. The oscillating power is just a side show, which needs to be known only for the purposes of circuit design ect.

Inductive reactance does not consume energy, it restricts it. It can restrict input and/or output depending on the device and the load.

Nor does counter emf consume energy. ie. if we apply a capacitor charged to 20 volts to a 12 volt battery then we are only really applying 8 volts potential difference to the battery due to the counter emf of 12 volts that the battery possesses, however the capacitor ends up charged to 12 volts not 0 volts so the potential equal to the counter emf is not consumed, it's just a kind of offset to get to the point where a potential difference will happen if more voltage is given to the cap.

Similarly when a transformer sees a high counter emf at idle the input is small, then when loaded the transformer sees less counter emf which allows more current to flow and the transfer of energy happens. If counter emf consumed energy the transformer would use more at idle when the counter emf is high. But it doesn't the counter emf restricts the current and power and saves energy.

..

So you agree?  DC of course is not a pure energy it is a stored or created potential.  All DC storage units discharge. 


DC transmissions talk about limits due to wire gauge and resistance in the wire, yet how does that change when the same wire is used for AC transmission?   The problem is in the flawed DC theory,  not the wire.   Imbalance creates a need for nature to balance it and she DOES find a way (really many ways).


How does Neuman get so much work done with so little amperage?  So if you are set to think work=amperage then you must justify all your beliefs based on this theory.   Lets admit it,  this box called IEEE training is flawed.  Yet all the believers must rail non-believers and this causes friction here and other (outside that box) forums. 


Even if you think watts=work load your going to have box limitations.  The closer truth is when you get a devices unseen forms or "spirits" moving then the physical follows.   But this is way outside the box limits for most to even accept as possible. 


I know I just stepped into a pooh pile,  but until we are willing to get our minds open we will keep smacking our heads on the brick walls of "closed thinking systems".


The inertia of mass in motion, speed of mass and the unstoppable force ideas are countered by the equal and opposite movements.  So all this "physical" matter can't be the only variables we need to work with,  so now we get to the label zero point energies.   Nice little package to box up and make unclear what was simply the exact opposite of physical matter.


But naming it "the spirit of matter" causes bent attitudes.   Just keep on keeping on then and like the phrase "do what you always have done and you will get what you always have got" will keep a sturdy little box.  Lets remember we want different results than what we have always gotten,  lets remember to be inventive without limiting the creative process.  You can bet those who have had success have.   I may not be keeper of all knowledge but I am not the limiter of it either.