Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[Angelic]

Thank you Hope,
We will all be looked at as cavemen at some point in time, with our primitive measuring equipment and electronic theory. Hopefully not to far in the future. I Hope

[Hope]

Unlike you I have not made false claims to a perpetual motion machine.  Unlike you I have not raised money to pay for globetrotting trips by building up hopes to help the poor.  What I design works.

MarkE   your attacking me thinking I am HopeGirl??


I have been a member here since what July 2010 and I am Richard Williams not some globetrotter.


AND by forum rules you are not to attack people,  we are all here to contribute ideas  not attack others.   Get a grip on your truth before you break rules.


I imagine you think any one named Clinton is Bill or Hillary too?? 

[MarkE]

MarkE   your attacking me thinking I am HopeGirl??


I have been a member here since what July 2010 and I am Richard Williams not some globetrotter.


AND by forum rules you are not to attack people,  we are all here to contribute ideas  not attack others.   Get a grip on your truth before you break rules.


I imagine you think any one named Clinton is Bill or Hillary too??

Richard, yes I thought you are the crook HopeGirl. 
We don't have interns flashing underwear here, Bill has other places to be.

[MarkE]

MarkE: In the same way, as you say  "no one forces you to read my post...", no one forces anyone to contribute to FTW cause. We're all adults and quite capable of making decisions for ourselves. We are all innocent until proven guilty. Same with FTW. Same as Witts. If Witts have something that really works and chose to sell their knowledge through repeated classes, that's their business. Right? There are engineers and others that vouched for the authenticity of Witts O.U devices powering their Armish settlements on YouTube. You can either believe or treat them as loonies. I happen to believe T.T is a true man of faith and is answerable to God for his actions and will leave it as fact he has a O.U device. The fact we can't reproduce it does not mean he's a fraud. He does differently from you and me.
Until this crowd is able to reproduce a working device, bad mouthing is not the solution. Save your time and energy for more worthwhile causes.
cheers,
chrisC

WITTS does not and never has had any working technology such as they have claimed.  FTW has proven the same to be true of themselves.

[F_Brown]

Here are some more thoughts about my QEG 2.0 model:

1)  Core losses and eddy current Lenz drag have been ignored, so that means core losses would show up as a reduction in the power dissipation of both the primary load and primary winding.  I previously estimated core losses at around 900 watts for a CEG putting out something around 10KW, so in my test run results the total output figure would remain the same and a core loss component of about 900 watts would be added and the dissipation for both the primary load and the primary winding would both need to be scaled downward appropriately.

2)  Lenz drag due to eddy currents in the rotor would increase the input torque, at this point by an unknown about.

3)  After some reflection this morning, I believe I improperly employed the arbitrary inductor model for the primary winding of the CEG 2.0 model.  That may be the cause of the parasitic oscillations and the unrealistic behavior.  I'll have to do some more FEMM analyses to generate the data necessary to fix that. 


Pmgr:

Because the coupling coefficient of the primary to secondary goes from a maximum, estimated.95, to a minimum of zero 4 times per rotor revolution.  I suspect power transfer from the primary to the secondary will be quite poor.  Because of that I decided to extract power directly from the primary.  The expect the coupling coefficient modulation is also the source of the frequency doubling you see in the secondary of your simulation.