Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[gravityblock]

There is nothing extraordinary about my statement.  It is just a simple statement of fact that you or anyone else can easily verify is true.

There is a distinction between a perfect conductor and a superconductor.  The Meissner effect in superconductors is distinct from Lenz's law in a perfect conductor.  Reply # 764 is in regards to a superconductor where you provided the wrong answer to the question, which the question itself was also in reference to a superconductor.  However, reply # 797, which you tried to use as an escape goat, is in regards to a perfect inductor and isn't relevant to the wrong answer you provided in reply # 764.  All you did was to muddy the water so you could escape if it was necessary.  In other words, you were playing both the "yes" card and the "no" card simultaneously to the same question where it would appear you wasn't wrong, regardless of the correct answer.

Gravock

[Acca]

 Oh.. here are the links to the Spanish FREE ENERGY DEVICE  MarkE !!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s0aAjmnVO_Q

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=387ErfGxpaU


page to the original post..

« Reply #936 on: May 15, 2014, 12:07:22 PM »



Acca...

[MarkE]

There is a distinction between a perfect conductor and a superconductor.  The Meissner effect in superconductors is distinct from Lenz's law in a perfect conductor.  Reply # 764 is in regards to a superconductor where you provided the wrong answer to the question, which the question itself was also in reference to a superconductor.  However, reply # 797, which you tried to use as an escape goat, is in regards to a perfect inductor and isn't relevant to the wrong answer you provided in reply # 764.  All you did was to muddy the water so you could escape if it was necessary.  In other words, you were playing both the "yes" card and the "no" card simultaneously to the same question where it would appear you wasn't wrong, regardless of the correct answer.

Gravock

If you would like to discuss a post, it is easy enough to quote it.  Mind reading is a different skill.

[MarkE]

Oh.. here are the links to the Spanish FREE ENERGY DEVICE  MarkE !!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s0aAjmnVO_Q

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=387ErfGxpaU


page to the original post..

« Reply #936 on: May 15, 2014, 12:07:22 PM »



Acca...

What do you think either of those videos establish?

[gravityblock]

If you would like to discuss a post, it is easy enough to quote it.  Mind reading is a different skill.

You will find the quotes below.....

Below is a quote from Verpies asking you a question in reference to a superconducting air coil.....

Instead of proving the obvious to me, you should concentrate on answering this interesting question:
Q: "A magnet is pulled out of a shorted superconducting aircoil.  Does the magnitude of the final current induced in that coil depend on how quickly the magnet is pulled out ?".

and you replied yes.......

The answer is yes: changing dB/dt changes the induced current.

The below quote is your escape goat for the wrong answer you gave above, which references a perfect inductor instead of a superconductor, as per the original question........

Actually the one thing that I overlooked is that the coil looking like a perfect inductor will identically integrate the rate of change in flux with respect to time, which should lead to a constant induction for a given magnet starting from a fixed distance.  Retracting the magnet in the opposite direction to its initial position relative to the ring reverses out whatever current was induced by bringing the magnet closer to the ring.

Lenz's law in a perfect conductor is distinct from the Meissner effect in superconductors, and you can not mix the two as you have done.  All you did was to muddy the water between a perfect conductor and a superconductor, so you could escape if it was necessary.  In other words, you were playing both the "yes" card and the "no" card simultaneously to the same question where it would appear you wasn't wrong, regardless of the correct answer.

Gravock