Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Propellantless electro-magnetic propulsion

Started by dustinthewind, April 08, 2014, 02:39:06 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

dustinthewind

I have a patent pending for a form of propellant-less EM propulsion that even my professor thought should work in his opinion after it was patent pending.  It is fully under my name but I am tired of the system and am thinking of publishing it for the public.  I am wondering how I would go about that.  Is it possible for me to take my patent pending and convert it to a general public licence?


I after some simulation effects it looks like the propulsion effect may increase per current squared but may possibly be even larger if some other effects are there.  It could possibly be dangerous and projects radiation out one end.  One would think that all the propulsion you would get is that of the radiation but I am getting forces estimated that seem much larger than just the radiation. 


Anyways my real question is about publishing my patent pending under the public license instead. 


All we are is dust in the wind.

TinselKoala

Well, I for one am intensely interested in such matters, so I would encourage you to go ahead and show what you've got. Your pending patent establishes priority and intellectual property already. I am not completely sure, but I think that now that you have applied and are in "pending" status you can talk about the claims of your invention without falling into the "previously published" category. You should check on this with your patent attorney, then go ahead and "tell all" right here on this forum.

dustinthewind

Well that is a thought.  I'll ask about that.  My reason for thinking of publishing under the public license is because once my patent pending expires I likely won't have the money to patent it and it could be taken by the company that did the patent pending for me possibly.  If I could transfer it then it would ensure it would be made available for public use. 
All we are is dust in the wind.

dustinthewind

Well it is patent pending and I guess it doesn't matter to post it so here it goes. 
All we are is dust in the wind.

TinselKoala

Hmm... that's interesting, and somewhat different from what I expected, having seen some things in field before. Do you mind if I show this to "a friend of ours" who is truly an expert in the field of propellantless em propulsion? I'd like to get his opinion.