Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


The Bessler Wheel, mystery solved.

Started by gurangax, April 24, 2014, 02:40:13 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 18 Guests are viewing this topic.

gurangax

Quote from: zoelra on April 27, 2014, 01:47:47 AM
So can we make the following assumption.  In a no weight scenario, the folding up or unfolding (depending on how you look at it) of the two stage lever/linkage (under its own weight) produces more height and thus more weight and leverage above the axle.


Anyway I suggest you make a test on real device and start learn from there.

zoelra

Much as been said about

Weights gained force from their own swinging (or movement).
- Bessler

The swinging interpretation is what supports the idea of CF.  Movement would imply something else which is what I believe you are alluding to.

I'm constantly working on builds and thinking of different models.  I don't rule out any design or principle until I can disprove it.  The "swinging" is what keeps my interest in the 2SO.

gurangax

Quote from: zoelra on April 27, 2014, 02:06:18 AM
Much as been said about

Weights gained force from their own swinging (or movement).
- Bessler

The swinging interpretation is what supports the idea of CF.  Movement would imply something else which is what I believe you are alluding to.

I'm constantly working on builds and thinking of different models.  I don't rule out any design or principle until I can disprove it.  The "swinging" is what keeps my interest in the 2SO.


I dont think its the CF more like the inertia of a moving object.


regards

zoelra

Besslers one-way wheels were very thin.  I would think that if there were z-axis components and movements, they would have to have been inside the axles, at least this is a possibility.  I'm thinking of something like MT34 for the weight shifting levers and weights.

gurangax

Quote from: zoelra on April 27, 2014, 02:20:25 AM
Besslers one-way wheels were very thin.  I would think that if there were z-axis components and movements, they would have to have been inside the axles, at least this is a possibility.  I'm thinking of something like MT34 for the weight shifting levers and weights.


no its just the same principle, with slight variations.


regards