The Holographic Universe and Pi = 4 in Kinematics!

[gravityblock]

LOL.  Now in attempting to defend your silly assertions with respect to your empty assertions directed at me, you're referencing your empty assertions made some time ago to TK.

Please show where my rebuttal to TK's dimensionless argument were devoid of any math, and devoid of where the actual data came from.  I clearly showed how the original dimensionless numbers faded away and changed into units/dimensions.  Please show me otherwise, instead of asserting. 

Gravock

[sarkeizen]

I did not deliberately avoid answering your question

Did you answer my question?  Nope.  Did you do so accidentally?  Nope.  Anything that is not accidental is deliberate right?

QED.

instead took your advice to get your thesis in words

I asserted how the Mathless-Wonder used a technique which has a consequence which should be obviously incorrect to someone with high-school math.  You, without asking even a single question declared that I was a) Making an argument and b) that it was wrong.

(Worth noting that you without hearing any evidence at all considered the position to be false.  Don't you think that kind of outs you as someone who has zero capability to critically examine their own beliefs?)

So I asked you again and you avoided the question.  You're still avoiding it now.  Here I'll ask you again:  Do you think this is a CORRECT way to get the length of the arc?  Yes? No? Don't know?  Keep on avoiding that question. 

as I previously did in the car race.

In the car race post you asked two questions. One was meaningless to me.  I told you so and the other was not put clearly enough for you and I to be talking about the same thing. Hence you did not get me to state my thesis in mutually agreed on terms.  Which, again if you read the relevant part of this thread.  You'll see that's what I was asking you to do and what you utterly failed to do for me.

However, I think most readers would disagree with you on this point.

Which is, of course irrelevant.  The statement in contention was "Did you ask me questions to get me to state my thesis in mutually agreed on terms."   Clearly the answer is no.   There wasn't even a single round of you directly responding to my statements.   Just stop trying to rescue your ego or whatever nonsense is going on here.

[sarkeizen]

In the context of...

Not what I asked.  Can you do what I asked or do you not know what I'm talking about?

[gravityblock]

Did you answer my question?  Nope.  Did you do so accidentally?  Nope.  Anything that is not accidental is deliberate right?

Ok, I will answer your question in the same manner you have been answering my questions.

Yes.  In the specific sense that it is meaningful to the problem at hand - which is measuring the perimeter of a circular path with a time element.  Satisfied?  Now, if you are willing to proceed, you will answer this question for me by falling flat on your face.

Gravock

[gravityblock]

Not what I asked.  Can you do what I asked or do you not know what I'm talking about?

It is you who is not doing what I ask.  Do you think pi is a dimensionless constant, or not?  Do you think the circumference is only a length and/or only a distance in both geometry and in the real world?  Please provide your definition of dimensionless, then answer the questions.  Or, do you not know what you are asking of me?  The thing is, you want to mix geometry that has taken the time element out of the equation and apply it to the real world which has a time element. 

Gravock