The Holographic Universe and Pi = 4 in Kinematics!

[sarkeizen]

by not swearing on the bible that he walked on the moon.  There was no moon landing,

So let's see if we can follow the nutbar logic:
i) Neil Armstrong said he walked on the moon
ii) Neil Armstrong refuses to swear on the Bible that he walked on the moon.
iii) An honest man wouldn't swear on the Bible about something that wasn't true.
iv) Therefore Neil Armstrong could not have walked on the moon.

However if iv) is true then....

v) Neil Armstrong would have lied many, many, many times about walking on the moon prior to iv)
vi) Therefore Neil Armstrong is not an honest man (at least in regard to walking on the moon)

Since iii) is required to force iv) but iii) can not be true if iv) is true.  Therefore the argument is invalid.

[gravityblock]

sarkeizen,

University after university, scientist after scientist, publication after publication, Quantum Mechanics, computer simulations, mathematics, etc. are all saying the universe is more likely a simulation than not.  The universe can not be explained in any kind of a rational and logical way other than a computer simulation.  You need to look at all of the evidence, and I am not going to do this for you.  It's already clear you and the other minions will say whatever proof is presented to you is not credible on the basis it doesn't fit into your own beliefs or agenda.  You being a white supremacist makes it known that you think through your false belief in your exceptionalism, and your false sense of being the chosen ones, that it is only you who can be right and no one else.  All I can say to you, is that you need to be True to yourself and let go of your pride and ego in order for you to grow and to mature into a being in which you were meant to be.  Let go of the hatred and the false-hoods, and embrace love, peace, and truthfulness.

Gravock

[gravityblock]

So let's see if we can follow the nutbar logic:
i) Neil Armstrong said he walked on the moon
ii) Neil Armstrong refuses to swear on the Bible that he walked on the moon.
iii) An honest man wouldn't swear on the Bible about something that wasn't true.
iv) Therefore Neil Armstrong could not have walked on the moon.

However if iv) is true then....

v) Neil Armstrong would have lied many, many, many times about walking on the moon prior to iv)
vi) Therefore Neil Armstrong is not an honest man (at least in regard to walking on the moon)

Since iii) is required to force iv) but iii) can not be true if iv) is true.  Therefore the argument is invalid.

Why can't iii) be true if iv) is true?  This is the same pattern of illogical deductions from you.  This way of thinking is total nonsense and is totally ridiculous.

Gravock

[sarkeizen]

Why can't iii) be true if iv) is true?

If iv) is true then vi) is true.  iii) and vi) can not both be true about Neil Armstrong about the same thing.

[sarkeizen]

University after university, scientist after scientist, publication after publication, Quantum Mechanics, computer simulations, mathematics, etc. are all saying the universe is more likely a simulation than not.

Then it shouldn't be so very hard to find a paper which makes that calculation.  Please do then we can discuss it.

You need to look at all of the evidence,

No you don't.  According to you "publication after publication" says the universe is more likely a simulation than not.  Hence there exists several single publication which makes this claim.  However unless one of them also makes a calculation then it is not STATISTICALLY STRONG EVIDENCE.  It might be evidence but it can not be STATISTICALLY STRONG by any useful definition of the terms.  If you agree with me then we don't need to discuss further because that was the erroneous claim you made earlier which I objected to.

It's already clear you and the other minions will say whatever proof is presented to you is not credible on the basis it doesn't fit into your own beliefs or agenda.

There is absolutely no evidence of this.  I have done nothing BUT attempt to listen to your POV.  You have done nothing but attempt to obfuscate it.  Only you fit the description you are foisting on me.

You being a white supremacist

Looking to get banned?  Say that again.