The Holographic Universe and Pi = 4 in Kinematics!

[Madebymonkeys]

Gravity shielding is more in-line with the meaning of what the screen name suggests.  If madebymonkeys can give me an alternative suggestion which is more in-line with the meaning of his user name, then I am all ears.

Gravock   

I, in my limited but infinite wisdom (!), believe we evolved, likely from Monkeys.
But, TBH, my username comes from: http://www.electronicsweekly.com/made-by-monkeys/

Does this help :-)

[Madebymonkeys]

What scientific evidence is there supporting this outrageous claim and assertion?

Gravock

Sarcasm, although the lowest form of humour (and my favorite), goes over only the smartest most intelligent heads. Even an incredibly special retarded PacMan can sometimes miss the subtle intricacies involved with the deployment of sarcasm.

Sponsored advert:
Forget sponsoring a Snow Leopard, spare a thought for the retarded PacMen and Women of the world. Give a retarded PacMan a fish and he will eat for a day, teach a retarded PacMan to fish and he will go hungry. You decide.

[gravityblock]

I, in my limited but infinite wisdom (!), believe we evolved, likely from Monkeys.
But, TBH, my username comes from: http://www.electronicsweekly.com/made-by-monkeys/

Does this help :-)

Yes, this helps!

May I ask why you believe we likely evolved from monkeys?  BTW, I like the limited but infinite wisdom part!  It's almost as good as having to slow down to speed up and to speed up to slow down!

Gravock

[Madebymonkeys]

Yes, this helps!

May I ask why you believe we likely evolved from monkeys?  BTW, I like the limited but infinite wisdom part!  It's almost as good as having to slow down to speed up and to speed up to slow down!

Gravock

Just a hunch, I like them better than Space Apes and single celled organisms.
I don't believe we were thrown down by Father Christmas on the 6th day either although if the whole 'god thing' is real then I suspect that retarded PacMen were made on the 8th.

[gravityblock]

Just a hunch, I like them better than Space Apes and single celled organisms.
I don't believe we were thrown down by Father Christmas on the 6th day either although if the whole 'god thing' is real then I suspect that retarded PacMen were made on the 8th.

So, your belief we evolved from monkeys is based only on a hunch and not based on any specific scientific evidence.  Are you sure your hunch isn't based on a wrong assumption that there is only a 2% difference in the DNA profile of a chimpanzee to that of a man?

Monkey's Uncle?

Evolutionists have trumpeted the similarity of the chimpanzee genome to that of humans, claiming that since the chimpanzee DNA profile matched ours up to 98% (debated number) that this was proof of evolution.  However, the 98% number relates only to the 2% of the respective genomes that code for protein.  In other words, there is only a 1.96% similarity of the chimpanzee genome to that of humans!

There is a small portion of the human genome that codes for proteins (less than 2% - genes).  The other 98% of the human genome is called "junk DNA" by evolutionists, saying it has no apparent purpose, that is until you account for millions if not billions of mutations based on random unguided processes that no longer have a phenotype in modern humans.  As scientists of the ENCODE project delved into the "junk"  parts of the DNA that are not actual genes containing instructions for proteins, they discovered a complex system that controls genes. It includes a system of  4 million switches that, acting like dimmer switches for lights, control which genes are used in a cell and when they are used, and determine, for instance, whether a cell becomes a liver cell or a neuron.  30,000 genes coded with 4 million dimmer like switches for control shows the complexity and the efficiency without any bloated bits of code with no design overkill or wasted building resources indicating an Intelligent Designer.

Given that, the Encode Project findings indicate that the vast majority of the two genomes are totally unrelated. In fact the extreme differences between the two species non coding DNA regions is too large to have occurred in the period alleged to have existed between the supposed evolution of chimps and man. 

Consider the term "junk DNA."  Implicit in this term is the view that because the genome of an organism has been cobbled together through a long, undirected evolutionary process, the genome is a patchwork of which only limited portions are essential to the organism.  Thus on an evolutionary view we expect a lot of useless DNA if it was purely random.  If, on the other hand, organisms are designed, we expect DNA, as much as possible, to exhibit function. And indeed, the most recent findings suggest that designating DNA as "junk" merely cloaks our current lack of knowledge about function (Dembski 1998).

Gravock