The Holographic Universe and Pi = 4 in Kinematics!

[Madebymonkeys]

So, your belief we evolved from monkeys is based only on a hunch and not based on any specific scientific evidence.  Are you sure your hunch isn't based on a wrong assumption that there is only a 2% difference in the DNA profile of a chimpanzee to that of a man?

Yep, only a hunch/guess - I really have absolutely no idea. We could have evolved from retarded PacMen for all I know :-)
Looks like even the guys who thought they did know, now don't.

[gravityblock]

Yep, only a hunch/guess - I really have absolutely no idea.

I can respect this, for it shows you are not totally brainwashed and still have a mind of your own!

Gravock

[gravityblock]

Holographic Model of the Universe (Full Text - PDF, 1.8MB).

Gravock

[MarkE]

That note under the picture falls into the junk science category.  The comment about Fourier analysis is as contextually stupid as saying something like:  "Here Bob uses a LASER level to install shelves in his den. The National Ignition Facility uses hundreds of LASERs to trigger nuclear fusion.  Bob's den may soon provide new insights into nuclear fusion."

Fourier analysis is routinely used to convert time domain representations into frequency domain representations.  There is nothing specific about Fourier analysis that restricts or otherwise binds it to holograms.

[gravityblock]

That note under the picture falls into the junk science category.  The comment about Fourier analysis is as contextually stupid as saying something like:  "Here Bob uses a LASER level to install shelves in his den. The National Ignition Facility uses hundreds of LASERs to trigger nuclear fusion.  Bob's den may soon provide new insights into nuclear fusion."

Fourier analysis is routinely used to convert time domain representations into frequency domain representations.  There is nothing specific about Fourier analysis that restricts or otherwise binds it to holograms.

I know you didn't read and fully grasp all 172 pages of information, and combed through all of the evidence and experiments contained within that publication in less than 16 minutes of time after the posting of the link.  You only looked at the snapshot and formed your final conclusion  based on not having all of the information, and also not having a context to put the snapshot into.  This was another intentional misdirection by you!  The snapshot shows how our physical movements may be encoded in our brains in a language of Fourier wave forms.  Also, the DeValoises used Fourier's equations to convert plaid and checkerboard patterns into simple wave forms. Then they tested to see how the brain cells in the visual cortex responded to these new wave-form images. What they found was that the brain cells responded not to the original patterns, but to the Fourier translations of the patterns. Only one conclusion could be drawn. The brain was using Fourier mathematics—the same mathematics holography employed—to convert visual images into the Fourier language of wave forms.

Pribram took his ideas into the laboratory and discovered that single neurons in the motor cortex respond selectively to a limited bandwidth of frequencies, a finding that further supported his conclusions. The question that began to bother him was, If the picture of reality in our brains is not a picture at all but a hologram, what is it a hologram of? The dilemma posed by this question is analogous to taking a Polaroid picture of a group of people sitting around a table and, after the picture develops, finding that, instead of people, there are only blurry clouds of interference patterns positioned around the table. In both cases one could rightfully ask, Which is the true reality, the seemingly objective world experienced by the observer/photographer or the blur of interference patterns recorded by the camera/brain? 

Pribram realized that if the holographic brain model was taken to its logical conclusions, it opened the door on the possibility that objective reality—the world of coffee cups, mountain vistas, elm trees, and table lamps—might not even exist, or at least not exist in the way we believe it exists. Was it possible, he wondered, that what the mystics had been saying for centuries was true, reality was maya, an illusion, and what was out there was really a vast, resonating symphony of wave forms, a "frequency domain" that was transformed into the world as we know it only after it entered our senses?  Realizing that the solution he was seeking might lie outside the province of his own field, he went to his physicist son for advice. His son recommended he look into the work of a physicist named David Bohm. When Pribram did he was electrified. He not only found the answer to his question, but also discovered that according to Bohm, the entire universe was a hologram.

Gravock