COP 20.00 (2000%) Times, Reactive Power Energy Source Generator,

[wayne49s]

"MY" circuit diagram was posted, twice, or perhaps 2 1/2 times, on the previous page of this thread, by x_name41. Some of my component values are different but the circuit is the same: a ZVS Royer-Mazilli type autoresonating circuit. Just get rid of the Red Herring "bi toroid" which is a wasteful power sink, and the "primary" becomes your transmission loop (with the 3-parallel spiral heavy conductor construction, or even copper pipe) and the reactive power accumulates by resonance and circulates within the tank circuit formed by that loop and its capacitors. I don't know what a Murray SERPS circuit is supposed to be, but I've clearly shown you a working, battery powered "Reactive Power Energy Source Generator". And it uses the same schematic but different component values from what has been posted in this thread by someone else, without anyone complaining.

Not only that but my remote wireless receiver "converts VARs" into usable power that is dissipated in the light bulb.

But please, if all that is off-topic, I apologize, don't let me distract you.

I see there is commonality in the extraction of the VAR energy. The Russian device is similar.
Which thread are you posting this on? What's the COP you're getting with your RPESG VAR device?
Thanks, Wayne

[Jdo300]

Hi Stefan,

It looks like your rendition of the SERPS schematic is headed in the right direction. I also did a circuit simulation of the setup according to your circuit idea and timings. Below is the code and a screenshot.

$ 1 5.0E-6 15.472767971186109 50 5.0 50
v 304 192 304 128 0 1 60.0 177.0 0.0 0.0 0.5
w 304 128 352 128 0
w 352 192 304 192 0
c 576 96 576 160 0 9.999999999999999E-6 -2.876241427016669
c 640 160 640 224 0 9.999999999999999E-6 -2.876241427016668
159 576 160 640 160 0 0.1 1.0E10
159 640 160 640 96 0 0.1 1.0E10
159 576 224 576 160 0 0.1 1.0E10
w 576 224 640 224 0
w 576 96 640 96 0
w 688 336 688 128 0
w 608 176 608 272 0
T 352 128 432 192 0 7.0362 1.0 1.3743310087148544 -1.3178404103425827 0.999
r 464 96 544 96 0 100.0
w 544 96 576 96 0
w 464 96 432 96 0
w 432 96 432 128 0
w 432 192 432 224 0
w 432 224 576 224 0
w 656 128 688 128 0
w 592 336 688 336 0
w 592 192 592 272 0
w 608 272 608 400 0
150 496 400 592 400 0 2 0.0
150 496 336 592 336 0 2 5.0
w 592 400 608 400 0
w 496 352 496 416 0
w 384 320 496 320 0
R 368 320 304 320 1 2 120.0 2.5 2.5 -1.0471975511965976 0.33333300000000005
R 368 384 304 384 1 2 120.0 2.5 2.5 -3.490658503988659 0.33333300000000005
x 203 329 282 335 0 24 Charge
x 175 390 283 396 0 24 Discharge
152 416 416 496 416 0 2 5.0
w 496 384 400 384 0
w 400 384 400 432 0
w 416 432 400 432 0
w 368 384 400 384 0
w 384 320 384 400 0
w 384 400 416 400 0
w 368 320 384 320 0
w 592 272 592 336 0
o 0 32 0 289 320.0 1.6 0 -1
o 0 32 1 291 320.0 9.765625E-5 1 -1
o 13 32 0 289 160.0 1.6 2 -1
o 13 32 1 35 320.0 9.765625E-5 3 -1

The waveforms I'm getting look almost exactly like what is shown in the original waveform captures from the conference, with the waveshapes and polarities matching pretty much right on (I also attached a copy of the screenshot again for reference/convenience). The only thing is that the return power going back to the grid, in the simulation, is much smaller then what they are showing on their scope traces. This is likely a matter of tuning the circuit component values, but I figured this simulation would be a good starting point for everyone to play with component values.

As a note, the two graphs on the left show the AC source's input current and power while the graphs on the right show the current and power consumption on the load resistor. In the simulation, Negative power on the AC source represents power flowing out, and positive power represents power flowing back into the AC source from the circuit.

- Jason O

[hartiberlin]

Hi Jason and all,
well done.
Maybe you can modify the circuit again, so that during charging we have 50 Ohms and during
discharge we have 100 Ohms as the load resistor ?
(or the other way around ?)
(Babcock and Murray uses 2 Lamps as the load and I guess they are also switching them...
otherwise they could just have used only 1 lamp...)

Please see, if you could get almost equal energy pulses as input and output this way ?

Many thanks.

Regards, Stefan.

[hartiberlin]

By the way here is a free video from the recent 2014 Bedini Energy Science conference.
It is the panel discussion where also Murray and Babcock took part.
It is free, if you subscribe to Aarons Newsletter.
Here is the link to it:

http://bit.ly/bedini2014

I am just  watching it, it is pretty interesting.

Regards, Stefan.

[Farmhand]

Nice work Stefan for working out how it's done, the sims match the scope shot wave forms quite well.

Just wondering though if the power charging the capacitors is being measured as output as well as the power when they discharge.

As the capacitors charge through the lamps the lamps would be seeing a reducing voltage across them.

Are we sure the sim is measuring the power output correctly ?

Should the power that charges the caps be measured as output?

I think the power from the cap discharge should be measured as output, but I don't think both charging and discharging of
the caps should be measured as output.

Just wondering.