Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



COP 20.00 (2000%) Times, Reactive Power Energy Source Generator,

Started by synchro1, May 07, 2014, 01:25:54 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

forest

I know nothing about reactive power but ...I believe it is resonant power trying to escape every way it could. Second , I found very interesting information that reactive power IS USED to keep stable voltage at the end of the transmission line which means it may be related to standing wave resonance.

synchro1

@Forest,

That's correct. Every power engineer masters the vector formula conceived of by Nicola Tesla. Reactive Power has to be generated and fed into the transmission line in proper amounts determined by the cosine for the (S) Apparent power leg of the triangle. (See below). The COSINE is the phase angle of the power factor. The (Q) Reactive Power signal see saws between the source and load while the high voltage current directs itself in tandem towards the load. Reactive Power is merely a carrier signal, and can do no work. It is needed to help the high voltage travel in the transmission line, and costs money to generate.

The video track shows the narrator discussing Maxwell, and his equations concerning electrical and magnetic fields. Then he goes on to say that people learned that current itself generated power. This was explained by Lorentz: The electrons bend when Reactive Power passes the voltage at 180 degrees. This creates magnetic fields around the electrons, like a partial loop in a coil. The fields intersect and power is generated on the Reactive side. This extra power has to be bled off, and is closely metered and disposed of. That's why the narrator goes on to explain that Tesla forecast that the transmission line grid could deliver 1000 times more power, for the same input cost, if Reactive Power line output were looped back into the grid. The OU Reactive Power factor for 400KV at the proper Power Factor Cosine is 37% in the transmission line from the Lorentz force. This is exactly what the experimenters are succeeding at in the video

Farmhand mentioned that the fact that the narrator mentioned Tesla a few times spoke "Volumes" about the hoax nature of the demonstration. This is absolute nonsense from a guy who uploaded a few videos and acts like some kind of savant.

synchro1


The power generated in the line by Lorentz force is termed "System Gain": From A.C. power wikipedia:

Generator_MVARs + System_gain + Shunt_capacitors = MVAR_Demand + Reactive_losses + Shunt_reactors

"The 'System gain' is an important source of reactive power in the above power balance equation, which is generated by the capacitive nature of the transmission network itself".


The video demonstrates "System Gain" on a test bench!

synchro1


PDF from member avalon; The Stepanov Reactive Power Transformer COP 9.4:




Farmhand

OK the patent application EP2429071 makes this disclosure and these claims below.

QuoteDisclosure of Invention
[0004] The technical result produced by the claimed
invention is that a single direct current source increases
significantly the continuous operation time thereof to the
length of the service life of the battery
.

QuoteClaims
1. A rechargeable autonomous power supply in a single
storage battery comprising a direct current source
and an inverter
having its output connected, via a
bridge rectifier, in parallel to a real load, said power
supply further having a second bridge rectifier, a
matching transformer, and two electronic transistor
switches with a control system, a diode, and a capacitors,
the input of the second bridge rectifier being
connected in parallel to the secondary winding of the
matching transformer that has its primary winding
connected in series to the inverter output and the
input of the first bridge rectifier having its output connected
in parallel to the capacitor and, via one electronic
switch, to a load with a capacitor, the output
of the second bridge rectifier being connected to the
capacitor and, via the second electronic switch and
diode, to the direct current source, and the control
electrodes of the transistor switches being connected
to the control circuit.


Now call me suspicious but I see a pattern, guy makes patent application which shows energy returned to the battery or in the case of Tariel he showed a supply disconnect switch and claimed it could power itself.

Using the patent application as some kind of validation they proceed to claim any number of devices that can self run and produce excess power, in Tariel's case he makes money with dodgy demo's where no one can check anything out, and takes investors money I guess. Who knows what Stepanov's angle is. I don;t think it helps anything for a lot of people to declare what he shows is legit and promote it without any real proof.

So we can see the patent application does not claim free energy, it only appears to, to some people. However I don't think it is as novel as he thinks it is.

As far as the demo with the light bank goes, he made a point to show there was no extra wires to the actual bank of load bulbs but made no effort to identify all wires into the box or the meters.

Simply put a video is good if all is shown and it makes some sense. But if the video raises more questions than it answers then it is not much to go on.