Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



COP 20.00 (2000%) Times, Reactive Power Energy Source Generator,

Started by synchro1, May 07, 2014, 01:25:54 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

SeaMonkey

FarmHand,

Your scope shots where you've added the "Take"
and "Give" regions
are quite good.

Interestingly, the Take and Give timings are just
the opposite of what a Reactive component would
do.

I can see how this would confuse the Power Meter.

Extracting power from the input waveshape on the
downward slope is easy stuff for Power Factor Correction
Circuits such as those used in Compact Fluorescent Lamps.

listener191

This simulation uses two parallel charge series discharge circuits each handling a half cycle. Careful use of squarewave sources with duty cycle setting and phase shifts was required to get the pulse switching pattern, which you can see if you scope the signal sources. Falstad could do with a decent pulse generator!

The discharge is switched out to an identical transformer which has an arbitrary load on the secondary.

Unfortunately Falstad is a lacking an RMS or average function on the metering. The current peak on the discharge is missleading as in practice you dont see this, and also looking at a visual average of the discharge its no more than 25% whereas in the real circuit this is closer to 66%, as measured.

This setup does illustrate what happen to the input when the power is not being returned. You can see the power developed in the discharge load resistor and the power developed in a resistor across the substitute transformer secondary.

The discharge power developed in a generator would depend on winding impedance.

Anyway I will let you all pick over the bones of this.

Barry






$ 1 5.0E-6 382.76258214399064 43 5.0 50
w 544 128 544 80 0
w 544 128 480 128 0
c 544 160 544 224 0 6.0E-6 76.52592094483336
c 544 320 544 400 0 6.0E-6 76.52592094484348
178 480 128 480 208 0 1 1.0E-9 -6.76E-321 0.05 1000000.0 1.0E-9 1000000.0
178 656 240 656 320 0 1 1.0E-9 -6.76E-321 0.05 1000000.0 1.0E-9 1000000.0
w 544 224 656 224 0
w 592 288 544 288 0
w 592 288 592 336 0
178 800 336 800 240 1 1 1.0E-9 9.999999999999999E-6 0.05 1000000.0 1.0E-9 1000000.0
w 800 336 592 336 0
w 656 224 656 240 0
w 608 240 608 192 0
w 624 240 624 192 0
w 624 192 688 192 0
w 608 192 608 144 0
w 688 192 688 144 0
v 608 144 688 144 0 2 50.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.25
w 432 128 432 96 0
w 432 96 608 96 0
w 608 96 608 144 0
w 448 128 448 112 0
w 448 112 688 112 0
w 688 112 688 144 0
w 752 240 752 192 0
w 768 240 768 176 0
w 592 176 592 192 0
w 592 192 608 192 0
w 544 288 464 288 0
w 464 288 464 208 0
w 640 320 640 400 0
w 640 400 544 400 0
w 288 272 288 400 0
r 192 272 128 272 0 0.01
w 128 192 192 192 0
v 128 192 128 272 0 1 50.0 155.0 0.0 3.141592653589793 0.5
w 288 400 544 400 0
w 288 112 288 192 0
w 992 128 992 112 0
w 976 128 976 96 0
178 1024 128 1024 208 0 1 1.0E-9 9.999999999999999E-6 0.05 1000000.0 1.0E-9 1000000.0
w 1088 128 1088 80 0
w 544 80 544 48 0
w 544 48 864 48 0
w 864 48 864 400 0
v 960 48 1040 48 0 2 100.0 5.0 5.0 3.141592653589793 0.5
w 544 128 544 160 0
w 544 288 544 320 0
w 1008 240 1008 208 0
w 1040 208 1056 208 0
w 960 48 960 96 0
w 960 96 976 96 0
w 992 112 1040 112 0
w 1040 112 1040 48 0
w 544 624 544 656 0
w 544 464 544 496 0
w 288 736 544 736 0
w 640 736 544 736 0
w 640 656 640 736 0
w 464 624 464 544 0
w 544 624 464 624 0
w 592 528 608 528 0
w 592 512 592 528 0
w 768 576 768 512 0
w 752 576 752 528 0
w 688 448 688 480 0
w 448 448 688 448 0
w 448 464 448 448 0
w 608 432 608 480 0
w 432 432 608 432 0
w 432 464 432 432 0
v 608 480 688 480 0 2 50.0 5.0 5.0 3.141592653589793 0.25
w 688 528 688 480 0
w 608 528 608 480 0
w 624 528 688 528 0
w 624 576 624 528 0
w 608 576 608 528 0
w 656 560 656 576 0
w 800 672 592 672 0
178 800 672 800 576 1 1 1.0E-9 1.099E-320 0.05 1000000.0 1.0E-9 1000000.0
w 592 624 592 672 0
w 592 624 544 624 0
w 544 560 656 560 0
178 656 576 656 656 0 1 1.0E-9 1.7944E-320 0.05 1000000.0 1.0E-9 1000000.0
178 480 464 480 544 0 1 1.0E-9 8.14E-321 0.05 1000000.0 1.0E-9 1000000.0
c 544 656 544 736 0 6.0E-6 -1.0305017283594964
c 544 496 544 560 0 6.0E-6 -1.030501728409758
w 544 464 480 464 0
w 544 464 544 416 0
v 752 128 832 128 0 2 50.0 5.0 5.0 4.71238898038469 0.25
v 752 464 832 464 0 2 50.0 5.0 5.0 1.5707963267948966 0.25
w 768 512 832 512 0
w 832 144 832 176 0
w 832 144 832 128 0
w 832 176 768 176 0
w 752 128 752 192 0
w 752 464 752 528 0
w 832 464 832 512 0
w 656 224 784 224 0
w 784 224 784 240 0
w 656 560 784 560 0
w 784 560 784 576 0
w 1088 80 1088 16 0
w 1088 16 288 16 0
w 288 16 288 112 0
w 288 400 288 736 0
w 640 736 1104 736 0
w 1104 272 1104 736 0
w 1024 128 1088 128 0
178 960 240 960 320 0 1 1.0E-9 9.999999999999999E-6 0.05 1000000.0 1.0E-9 1000000.0
w 992 112 960 112 0
w 928 240 928 144 0
w 928 112 960 112 0
w 960 96 912 96 0
w 912 128 912 240 0
w 960 240 992 240 0
w 1104 224 1104 192 0
w 992 256 1104 256 0
w 1104 256 1104 224 0
r 1056 208 1056 400 0 200.0
r 944 320 944 400 0 200.0
w 864 400 944 400 0
w 944 400 1056 400 0
w 544 416 864 416 0
w 864 400 864 416 0
w 912 96 912 128 0
w 928 112 928 144 0
r 1200 192 1200 272 0 400.0
T 192 192 288 272 0 6.0 1.0 0.014459698315488212 -3.333165821949591E-4 0.999
w 992 240 992 256 0
T 1104 192 1200 272 0 4.0 1.0 0.25660762824587957 -0.2570513548740243 0.999
o 35 64 1 291 80.0 9.765625E-5 0 -1
o 120 64 1 35 32.73390607896142 9.765625000000001E-155 1 -1
o 119 64 1 35 37.41444191567111 9.765625E-55 2 -1
o 127 64 1 35 74.82888383134222 9.765625E-55 3 -1

Farmhand

Ok so I took the liberty of modifying your wave form again with blue lines to show approximately what the current trace would be.
From that we can determine the normal "not switched" load power. If we assume the voltage trace to be 560 volts peak to peak
and the current trace to be 0.076 volts peak to peak and sensed through a 0.1 Ohm resistor, then we would need to convert to
RMS voltage on both so that would be 198 volts and current trace (0.027 volts across the 0.1 Ohms) or 0.27 Amps RMS.

Remember I'm just working this out based on what I think the traces mean.

Normal Not switched load power.
So 198 Volts RMS x 0.27 Amps "RMS" = 53.46 VA RMS then if we look at the phase it seems to be 30 degrees or
0.866 power factor. So 53.46 x 0.866 = 46.29 Watts "real load power" with 53.46 VA which would leave 7.17 VAR. 

Now if we move more current from in phase to "out of phase" we will change the power factor and therefore the real load power
will reduce even though the 53.46 VA won't change, there will be more VAR and less "real load power". That's just the load power.

Obviously the switched load power must be less than the not switched load power.

We also need to consider that some current is taken from one half cycle "in phase" and returned to the next half cycle
(opposite polarity and mostly out of phase). An energy meter would likely not deal well with that.

But we can calculate what the effect of the moving of the current actually does to the load power, and the reactive power due to
the switching will be returned. If the input wave forms mirror the output then we can determine the powers that way as well.

..


listener191

Hi Farmhand,

Cheap energy meters see the peak of the projected current sine over the gap between charge and discharge pulses, hence for this waveform on my setup, the meter displays 34W, 93VA, 0.37PF so 59VAR, 68 deg.

Barry

listener191

Attached is a circuit that I am prototyping for a new hi power Bi-directional power switch.

As SERPS is hard switching at various points on the incoming AC sine wave, both IGBTS and MOSFET's have a hard time with this, as their SOA's accommodate high current pulse switching with limited duty cycle.

When you look at their high duty cycle or continuous ratings, they paint a sad picture, with many 100A peak rated devices only handling 10A or less in the 100 to 230V region. Their square RBSOA's mean they can turn off at max current and max voltage rating. Most IGBTS operating on AC circuits are zero voltage switched to avoid the turn on limitations.

This switch uses an IGBT in series with an SCR.
The IGBT turns on before the SCR and can handle 40A under this condition and is used to turn the SCR off.
The SCR I am using can turn on within 900ns and can switch at full current and voltage rating. The IGBT can turn on in 43ns and turn off within 127ns. The IGBT only sees  its CE volt drop during switching.

The SCR has a delay applied to its gate of 100ns obtained via the propagation delay of 4 inverters. The delay always ensures the the SCR turns on after the IGBT. After testing  the SCR 900ns turn on time v 43ns IGBT turn on time may  confirm that no additional delay is necessary.

The TLP351F is used as a compact isolator driver for both devices. The output current rating allows it to also provide the trigger current for the SCR, whereas many opto couplers have boarderline  capability to trigger the 25TTS12PbF SCR  i.e. 40-60mA.

An SCR with a larger current rating could also be used with this IGBT  to extend the rating of the switch to 40A if required.

The ULN2804A transistor array is used to drive the photo coupler led's. 4049's could provide enough drive current for this but in the past, heating of this inverter was a problem and the rise time is better via the transistor array approach.

I have tested one SCR IGBT section of the switch and it looks to be good.

Barry