COP 20.00 (2000%) Times, Reactive Power Energy Source Generator,

[hartiberlin]

If you look at the complex pointers arroy diagramm
http://www.overunity.com/14607/cop-20-00-2000-times-reactive-power-energy-source-generator/dlattach/attach/138224/

to produce 52.7 Watts at the lamps you need to supply at least then about 55 Watts of
Aparent power and also about 53 Watts of reactive power , while the real active input power is
only 1.1 Watts...

To produce 55 Watts of aparent power with about 53 Watts of reactive power you don´t need much
power, just a low power LC circuit on its own resonance frequency with some feedback transistor circuit...
As the Babcock/Murray circuit delivers all the AC current back that is feeded into it, the load on the driver
LC circuit will not be big and thus the power only oscillates back and forth...You only
need to use low loss wires, so bigger diameter stranded of litz wire copper cables with low I^2R losses...


Regards, Stefan.

[TinselKoala]

Well, if you believe that indicates real OU performance, then you really should award the Overunity Prize... to me, based on the device and measurements I showed in the QEG thread. Because I am measuring the same kind of power in basically the same manner.
And after all, mine is battery powered and fits inside a small box, too.

Electrical devices that take electrical input and produce electrical output can most definitely be self-looped if they produce a _real_ COP of about 135 percent. If someone claims a COP of 9 or 20 or something silly like that from a device with electrical inputs and outputs, but cannot self-loop it... you can know _for sure_ that it is a mismeasurement or misinterpretation of measurement.

[havuhung]

Hi All,
How to have a complete schematic for renewable and testing this device?

Regards

[Farmhand]

If you look at the complex pointers arroy diagramm
http://www.overunity.com/14607/cop-20-00-2000-times-reactive-power-energy-source-generator/dlattach/attach/138224/

to produce 52.7 Watts at the lamps you need to supply at least then about 55 Watts of
Aparent power and also about 53 Watts of reactive power , while the real active input power is
only 1.1 Watts...

To produce 55 Watts of aparent power with about 53 Watts of reactive power you don´t need much
power, just a low power LC circuit on its own resonance frequency with some feedback transistor circuit...
As the Babcock/Murray circuit delivers all the AC current back that is feeded into it, the load on the driver
LC circuit will not be big and thus the power only oscillates back and forth...You only
need to use low loss wires, so bigger diameter stranded of litz wire copper cables with low I^2R losses...


Regards, Stefan.

The problem is Stefan that the 55 Watts apparent power includes the 53 Watts reactive power and the power consumed by the
lamps is real power as soon as it powers a load, so the output (real power) is 52.7 or 53 Watts dissipated by the load and the
reactive power is that which is returned to the grid.

Remember "energy" is actually what is dissipated by the load and if energy is dissipated then power is consumed and it takes
energy to furnish that power.

Somewhere there is a mistake or it's a con. All real and reactive power in a grid powered device is supplied by the grid and if that
reactive power is not returned to the grid then it is paid for or stolen.

If these systems are meant to free us from the grid then why do they always use the grid ? It makes no sense.

If you do the search below and click on the link to the "Alternating Voltage Control Apparatus" PDF it shows a system I think is very similar and likely superior.
https://www.google.com.au/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=Patent%203%2C735%2C673

Having said that, if they actually show any real over C.O.P. =1.0 performance then I'll use it if I can. I'm waiting but not for them
to show OU, I'm waiting for several years to pass with nothing coming of it.

..

[forest]

If you look at the complex pointers arroy diagramm
http://www.overunity.com/14607/cop-20-00-2000-times-reactive-power-energy-source-generator/dlattach/attach/138224/

to produce 52.7 Watts at the lamps you need to supply at least then about 55 Watts of
Aparent power and also about 53 Watts of reactive power , while the real active input power is
only 1.1 Watts...

To produce 55 Watts of aparent power with about 53 Watts of reactive power you don´t need much
power, just a low power LC circuit on its own resonance frequency with some feedback transistor circuit...
As the Babcock/Murray circuit delivers all the AC current back that is feeded into it, the load on the driver
LC circuit will not be big and thus the power only oscillates back and forth...You only
need to use low loss wires, so bigger diameter stranded of litz wire copper cables with low I^2R losses...


Regards, Stefan.

Good confirmation that there is no law of conservation of work. The same amount of ENERGY can do MUCH more work in some circumstances, limited only to the friction ! Limit the friction and you got apparent overunity and REAL MORE WORK DONE (compared to more wasteful methods)