Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Current ridicule

Started by raburgeson, May 08, 2014, 07:54:11 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

CuriousChris

Quote from: MarkE on June 15, 2014, 05:52:30 AM
And yet over that same period of time SP, and MP fuel injection in automobiles became common as did direct injection in Diesel engines.  So if Shell's intent was to prevent fuel efficiency improvements, why didn't they block fuel injection developments?  Have you considered that a smart businessperson tries to identify trends and get ahead of those trends in a profitable way?

It only proves that you can't suppress innovation. No matter how big and wealthy and powerful you may be. you can only slow it down.

They held off the inevitable for a period of time. but patents expire and there are plenty willing to make a buck. but If you don't accept what I say and you should know already I am a major sceptic on conspiracy theories so I am not likely to support this sort of thing without proof, find out for yourself its easy to do.

Google patents held by shell oil of Canada. You will see hundreds from the 50s through to the eighties all related to fuel saving devices. Perhaps Shell themselves actually developed these patents perhaps they actively suppressed them. I cant really say. But at the time I thought they were suppressing them.

The thing that struck me as really really odd was it was Shell Oil of Canada. Not Shell Oil international nor Mobil or Caltex. Why Shell Oil of Canada. I figured there was legal reasons but did not have the resources to find out why that may be so.

CANGAS

Quote from: MarkE on June 15, 2014, 05:52:30 AM
And yet over that same period of time SP, and MP fuel injection in automobiles became common as did direct injection in Diesel engines.  So if Shell's intent was to prevent fuel efficiency improvements, why didn't they block fuel injection developments?  Have you considered that a smart businessperson tries to identify trends and get ahead of those trends in a profitable way?


MarkE, I have already praised your skill at trying to pervert a discussion. Now you are still trying to outdo your previous performance. You sure have bravado!

You have (as a joke, perhaps?) suggested that Shell bought , and , therefore, controlled the use of, all those patents because they just wanted to learn about business trends that might naffect the oil business. Well, uhhhh, why go to all the expense of buying the patents when ALL THEY HAD TO DO WAS JUST READ THE PATENT WHEN IT WAS ISSUED AND PUBLISHED??? 

THE IMPORTANT QUESTION IS.....WHY DID SHELL WANT TO BUY THE PATENTS ON METHODS TO GREATLY REDUCE THE CONSUMPTION OF OIL??


CANGAS 49

MarkE

Quote from: CANGAS on June 15, 2014, 06:13:59 AM

MarkE, I have already praised your skill at trying to pervert a discussion. Now you are still trying to outdo your previous performance. You sure have bravado!

You have (as a joke, perhaps?) suggested that Shell bought , and , therefore, controlled the use of, all those patents because they just wanted to learn about business trends that might naffect the oil business.Well, uhhhh, why go to all the expense of buying the patents when ALL THEY HAD TO DO WAS JUST READ THE PATENT WHEN IT WAS ISSUED AND PUBLISHED??? 

THE IMPORTANT QUESTION IS.....WHY DID SHELL WANT TO BUY THE PATENTS ON METHODS TO GREATLY REDUCE THE CONSUMPTION OF OIL??


CANGAS 49
I suggest that you reread what I wrote.  Businesses buy into promising technologies in their field all the time.  Do you think that PriceLine just bought Open Table so that they can shelve it?  Buying into a technology that if successful would cut into a company's core business is called hedging.  It is rather routine.  It does not have to be the least bit sinister.  You have yet to show that Shell did anything untoward.  You need to show where they bought up technology rights and then kept them from the market.  So far, all you have is them buying some technology rights.  You need to come up with the other half.

sarkeizen

Quote from: CuriousChris on June 15, 2014, 06:08:04 AM
Google patents held by shell oil of Canada.
You're going to have to be more specific.  A Canadian patent search on "Shell oil" and "fuel" returns 40 results.  Majority of which are about fuel composition.   Most of them appear to be held by Shell USA too.

CuriousChris

Quote from: sarkeizen on June 15, 2014, 09:36:15 AM
You're going to have to be more specific.  A Canadian patent search on "Shell oil" and "fuel" returns 40 results.  Majority of which are about fuel composition.   Most of them appear to be held by Shell USA too.

Remembering I am referring back 30 years...

I definitely recall it as being Shell Canada but nonetheless I limited the search to just Shell...

This search has 167 hits on just one type of system which I was researching at the time

https://www.google.com/search?tbo=p&tbm=pts&hl=en&q=inassignee:%22Shell+Oil+Co%22#hl=en&q=inassignee%3A%22Shell%22+vaporize+internal+combustion&tbm=pts

Given some time and a little inclination I think I could do better than a quick 5 minute attempt