1939 Gravity Power - multiply power by 1200%

[i_ron]

ok..the upper shaft may be rotating , but its primary purpose is as a lever. No rotary power is fed in from above. as i see it. Therefore my model achieves the same,. with my linear bearing taking the place of the gimbals..

To be very clear, within the limits of English, the top of the top section rod is describing a circle.


One can see the little driving arm, going around in the rod closest to the camera in the full video.


There is no linear back and forth motion at either end of the top section rod


The gimbal is at the bottom end of this rod.


Now in the one instance, just after the weigh swinging example, one can see the rod passing through the gimbal. Watch the left hand rod in particular. The top of the rod is tracing out a circle and so does the bottom of the rod. The rod does not bend or distort, when the top of this rod is outboard, the lower end is inboard, the bottom portion of the rod is at all times lined up with the top portion.


It is only three seconds, watch the full video and see the circle that the bottom of this rod traces...


Here it is in a slow motion view...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g3zs8vcBJyE


I hope this helps


Ron


.

[i_ron]

There is no linear back and forth motion at either end of the top section rod

The two opposite rods we see in the slow mo vid obviously move from side to side.


But the far left rod moves in and out


This establishes the four quadrants of a  circle.


The approximate frames are 8 and 20, the rod beneath the gimbal moves in and out, exactly
as it would do if following a circular path


Ron


               

[i_ron]

This is how I see it


regards


Mike

Mike,


I think the gimbal is drawn incorrectly and also the holes in the square plate.


Luc,


This is my 900th post... watch out, I'm catching up! LOL


I made many of those talking to our good friend Thane.


I do hope my little contribution here is not taken the wrong way but this linear
motion thing has bothered me from the beginning, anyway, no offence everyone.


Take Care


Ron

[turbogt16v]

as it seams from video that the rod is making circle motion,
i am skeptic,because in newspaper article skinner said the key is
in off-balanced weights that move in elliptical orbit,
and if the upper rod is moving in circle,we don't get any elliptical motion.
i advice to do  both models

http://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth73611/m1/2/zoom/?zoom=5&lat=2690&lon=3903&layers=BT

[Craigy]

Iwill build both, since its quicker to build than argue the toss. Although my current model is showing  that it is decoupled from its input, When stalling the output  there is no effect on the input current and of course we have an elliptical orbit.

So right or not it, has some desirable atributes even before i add the second weight..

the same conversation is taling place over at energetic where there is a totally different opinion on all of this

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/17195-william-f-skinner-1939-gravity-power-4.html#post257309