1939 Gravity Power - multiply power by 1200%

[i_ron]

Seems kind of quiet around here?

Got one video done but where I'm living at this time the internet bandwidth is very limited, so video uploading is very slow and can cut off at any time, then you got to start all over again. To help get it done I divided the video demo in two parts.

Here is the first part: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00xIxEQqRsk&feature=youtu.be

The next part may be in two hours or more. Also, this video is unlisted, so you need the link to watch it.

Luc

Nice innovative build Luc, edge of chair until the second vid


Ron

[AB Hammer]

Do you think grease will work better than oil?

Luc

I said grease due to most pillow blocks I've seen have grease fittings but if you use oil? Use a synthetic for it sticks to the parts better.  Grease heats up as in the bearings themselves due to friction and become fluid like to the parts and would do the same in the pillow. That is the main reason I said grease.

Alan

[gotoluc]

Nice innovative build Luc, edge of chair until the second vid


Ron

Well Ron, I won't keep you in suspense. There's no detectable gain at this time and I had a feeling there wasn't going to be with the first try. Still many things we need to try.

Did you ever noticed the change in angle of the upper weight when Mr. Skinners device is operating compared to when it's stopped?... I've been thinking that's important and why I started to think the Gravity transfer is coming from the upper weight.

If you think about the way I have my lower shaft bent, its weight does not change, it just goes around much like a flywheel. If this is truly the way Mr. Skinner has his, then you have to consider the influence gravity must be coming from the top weigh and pressing down on the angled bottom shaft. So if that top weight is super heavy and is easy to turn because it shaft turning it is using leaver action but also being pushed back up a little because the bottom shaft is under load, so the weight doesn't fall as long as it's turning and have enough load to keep it up a little.  Would that not transfer gravity in the lower shaft?
Do you follow that?

Luc

[havuhung]

Hi gotoluc,
Thank you.

[i_ron]

Well Ron, I won't keep you in suspense. There's no detectable gain at this time and I had a feeling there wasn't going to be with the first try. Still many things we need to try.

Did you ever noticed the change in angle of the upper weight when Mr. Skinners device is operating compared to when it's stopped?... I've been thinking that's important and why I started to think the Gravity transfer is coming from the upper weight.

If you think about the way I have my lower shaft bent, its weight does not change, it just goes around much like a flywheel. If this is truly the way Mr. Skinner has his, then you have to consider the influence gravity must be coming from the top weigh and pressing down on the angled bottom shaft. So if that top weight is super heavy and is easy to turn because it shaft turning it is using leaver action but also being pushed back up a little because the bottom shaft is under load, so the weight doesn't fall as long as it's turning and have enough load to keep it up a little.  Would that not transfer gravity in the lower shaft?
Do you follow that?

Luc

Nope, lol


OK, not too surprising.


I did notice that the drive plate does not follow the angle of the upper shaft in WS's design, but remains
horizontal or close to it at all times.


One other thing is, it is not carved in stone that the upper drive be perpendicular to the lower unit, if you were to offset them then you have an elliptical drive.



Ron