KARPEN PILE

[MarkE]

Google 'sheehan epicatalysis' for that paper. I never claimed that textbook authors on spillover point out a kelvin discrepency.spillover researchers are paid to research industrial catalysis and improve industrial catalysis and nothing more.the fact remains that the original karpen cell itself and all catalyst cells like it indeed behave in a manner consistent with textbooks ie.they behave in a manner consistent with catalytic spillover.a handfull of guys have now noticed its horrifying reversability.

OK, so you can't fix the link.  Let's set that aside.
Your statement that: 

I never claimed that textbook authors on spillover point out a kelvin discrepency.

appears to undermine months and months of representations by you that text books support your Second Law violation claims.  You've just given Sarkeizen a field day.

If you come up with actual evidence to support your ideas then I will look.  I have little interest in hunting down references that you say support your ideas when you cannot even seem to locate those references.  It kind of boggles my mind how you can feel certain of the contents of something that you do not have available to review.

[profitis]

Very simple.you take catalysts that are impossible to galvanicly corrode eg nickel-hydroxide,Fe2O3  or TiO2 or MnO2 or FTO and see if you get a spillover-marker potential btween them.(And you do).you also take metallic galvanic couples that  give a spontaneous-reverse potential eg Au-MnO2 or impossible galvanic potential eg Pt-Pt, Ni-Ni,TiO2-TiO2 and check for the marker-potential.comparison under nitrogen or argon helps too

[MarkE]

Very simple.you take catalysts that are impossible to galvanicly corrode eg nickel-hydroxide,Fe2O3  or TiO2 or MnO2 or FTO and see if you get a spillover-marker potential btween them.(And you do).you also take metallic galvanic couples that  give a spontaneous-reverse potential eg Au-MnO2 or impossible galvanic potential eg Pt-Pt, Ni-Ni,TiO2-TiO2 and check for the marker-potential.comparison under nitrogen or argon helps too

These are your claims, so you are free to arrange whatever experiments you feel will support those claims.

[profitis]

These are not my claims.these are the textbook claims.according to the textbook literature, spillover should happen between eg. MnO2 and nickel-hydroxide.you are free to test a profitis cell to your hearts content.it is capable of many times original karpen power density in a multi-cell battery.

[mscoffman]

I can propose an experiment.  Have Profitis come up with a list of how a rate change
in the the spillover reaction would manifest itself in several different cells. Then expose
those cells to a step increase in a PEP-II neutrino beam at the Fermi-Lab accelerator's
2MW PEP-II neutrino beam. So that the cell receives from 2 to 10 times the standard
flux of neutrinos. As a show stopper also vary the neutrino mass through a range
and show that there is a resonance like tuning peak in the spillover reaction exactly
at the PEP-II neutrino mass.


:S:MarkSCoffman