Akula eternal lantern 4

[MarkE]

How can you pretend to know such things as the level of "electro-smog" in Dr. Stiffler's laboratory when he was the one there doing the testing not you?

Dr. Stiffler failed to establish the levels in his demonstrations, therefore pretty much invalidating them.

[synchro1]

Dr. Stiffler failed to establish the levels in his demonstrations, therefore pretty much invalidating them.

@MarkE,

You just failed to watch enough of his videos. You impress me as an impudent punk. You pretend Dr. Stiffler is that stupid.

[MarkE]

@MarkE,

You just failed to watch enough of his videos. You impress me as an impudent punk. You pretend Dr. Stiffler is that stupid.

Synchro1, once again it is not up to me or anyone else to go searching for evidence that might support your claims.  You posted links to two videos and said that they support what you claim when they do nothing of the kind.  If you want your claims to carry weight, then come up with evidence that supports them.

[synchro1]

Synchro1, once again it is not up to me or anyone else to go searching for evidence that might support your claims.  You posted links to two videos and said that they support what you claim when they do nothing of the kind.  If you want your claims to carry weight, then come up with evidence that supports them.

@MarkE,

You have no native interest in Dr. Stiffler's work because you strive solely to discredit him. Some people delve into his videos with relish. You on the other hand are adverse to the learning. You keep your blindfold tied tight. You are a very poor student. I refuse to keep placing material in your lap when you act like a spoiled a child who just tosses it to one side. I would have viewed all his videos voluntarily as I have instead of being asked to view them one by one squintingly. Your not worth the effort. You're just a chronic cynic addicted to ridicule with no learning ability. Find someone else to act like a "Patsy" for you!

[MarkE]

@MarkE,

You have no native interest in Dr. Stiffler's work because you strive solely to discredit him. Some people delve into his videos with relish. You on the other hand are adverse to the learning. You keep your blindfold tied tight. You are a very poor student. I refuse to keep placing material in your lap when you act like a spoiled a child who just tosses it to one side. I would have viewed all his videos voluntarily as I have instead of being asked to view them one by one squintingly. Your not worth the effort. You're just a chronic cynic addicted to ridicule with no learning ability. Find someone else to act like a "Patsy" for you!

Dude:  Again, it is up to you to present evidence for your claims.  If you have videos that support your claims, then barring them each being three hours long, I am happy to look.  It's not my fault that you posted links to videos that fail to support your claims.  It is absurd that you claim you are teaching something when your evidence doesn't support your claims.  If you don't wish to support your claims, or are unable to support your claims you should not be surprised that others reject them.