Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Akula eternal lantern 4

Started by MenofFather, June 01, 2014, 01:15:57 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

Hoppy

Quote from: Void on March 04, 2015, 06:25:52 PM
Hi Hoppy. Yes, leaving the device running for a long duration in a test lab might be advisable,
but you could also just check for super caps or similar if you do a full disassembly and inspect/test/measure
each individual part. I think any reasonably cautious person would request to be able to do such thorough testing
before agreeing to any money exchange. If they don't agree to such a test, then an investor can simply move on.
Again, not a major problem. :)
All the best...

It would certainly be prudent to do so! The investor would need to decide if the device runs long enough for it to warrant a self-running label. In the case of Lasersabers device, it runs for a very long time and may well tempt an investor to deem it self-running, even if the device did contain a super-cap. The label in this case would then be misleading and dishonest in the generally accepted definition of the term 'self-running'. The point I'm trying to make here is that the investor decides if he can, if you will - 'get away with it' - legally. In the case of the electroscope I mentioned earlier, this was a classic case of getting away with it legally because it has never been scientifically proven that a bent coat hanger or hazel wand etc., can or cannot detect buried artefacts or hoards of coins in the hands of an operator skilled in the art of dowsing. The downfall in this case was the fact that the concealed circuitry did not match up to description. In the same way a very long running Lasersaber type device cannot be easily proven not to have a component of 'free energy' assisting its operation. It rests with the investor to make a judgement as to whether a device can be sold without legal comeback.

MarkE

Quote from: Hoppy on March 05, 2015, 03:51:03 AM
It would certainly be prudent to do so! The investor would need to decide if the device runs long enough for it to warrant a self-running label. In the case of Lasersabers device, it runs for a very long time and may well tempt an investor to deem it self-running, even if the device did contain a super-cap. The label in this case would then be misleading and dishonest in the generally accepted definition of the term 'self-running'. The point I'm trying to make here is that the investor decides if he can, if you will - 'get away with it' - legally. In the case of the electroscope I mentioned earlier, this was a classic case of getting away with it legally because it has never been scientifically proven that a bent coat hanger or hazel wand etc., can or cannot detect buried artefacts or hoards of coins in the hands of an operator skilled in the art of dowsing. The downfall in this case was the fact that the concealed circuitry did not match up to description. In the same way a very long running Lasersaber type device cannot be easily proven not to have a component of 'free energy' assisting its operation. It rests with the investor to make a judgement as to whether a device can be sold without legal comeback.
Claims that the device is powered by the earth's magnetic field are blatantly false.  Competent examination will expose the specific details of Akula's ruse.  Such examination will be forcefully resisted as it would immediately kill any investment in what is just another battery powered LED light.

a.king21

The fact that all Akula can claim is a measly half to one watt when he reckons to have hundreds of watts  in his videos is proof enough that he is not worth following and is a waste of time.


I have maintained for some time that Kapanadze's devices are eye candy and the real secret is buried deep inside his device, probably a transformer anomaly.
For some reason he always liked to offer me three phase. He likes three phase transformers.
Look there.



Hoppy

Quote from: a.king21 on March 05, 2015, 06:13:58 AM
The fact that all Akula can claim is a measly half to one watt when he reckons to have hundreds of watts  in his videos is proof enough that he is not worth following and is a waste of time.


Agreed. Most experienced constructors could cobble together a very low powered device as unconvincingly demonstrated as that we see in the video.

Void

Quote from: a.king21 on March 05, 2015, 06:13:58 AM
The fact that all Akula can claim is a measly half to one watt when he reckons to have hundreds of watts  in his videos is proof enough that he is not worth following and is a waste of time.

I have maintained for some time that Kapanadze's devices are eye candy and the real secret is buried deep inside his device, probably a transformer anomaly.
For some reason he always liked to offer me three phase. He likes three phase transformers.
Look there.

Hi a.king21. I can't say what either Kapadnadze or Akula are really doing, but if Akula's devices really do work, I think
possibly Akula's higher power devices may be proving unstable in one or more ways. He seems to have gone with
the lower power device, at least for now, which he says he can make quite stable now, and which he says can scale up
to about 50 Watts. Stability is a very important factor if you are planning to market a device like this. The higher power devices
Akula has previously demonstrated, if they really work,  just may not be there yet as far as stability, or may not work the same
in different locations as has been suggested by some. At any rate, even if a person only has a self runner that can only initially
produce say 1/2 watt reliably, it is still something that will be of great interest, as the potential is immense. Who knows where 
such things could lead with in depth R&D.

I suspect that if Akula's current device really does work, that it may be due to some process occurring in the ferrite itself. The
description to the latest video suggests that this is an important factor as well. In some previous videos by Akula he has also indicated
that this is an effect that he was investigating, and what he thinks was making some of his similar devices work. This is something that I am
continuing to experiment with, but there are various different ferrite compositions and who knows if Akula is not coating his ferrites with some
substance as well. My suggestion that it might be a good idea to test Akula's devices of this type with a Geiger counter is based on this idea as well. :)

I'd be interested to hear from Stefan on this. Stefan, have you viewed any of Akula's devices in person, and if so, what was your impression?
Do you have any further info to add to this discussion?

All the best...