Akula eternal lantern 4

[MarkE]

@MarkE,

You simply haven't looked at Dr. Stiffler's videos. I'm not going to start to spoon feed you again. You can dwell in your ignorance.
Go back to post #212 and look at the second video. You show up routinely with a blind spot the size of Texas!

The other important fact is that Akula manufactured a ferrite alloy with molecular characteristics that complement the body of "Spatial Resonant Frequencies" that free up and channel electrons.

It's important to understand that the "Lattice Emitting Resonant Frequencies" only appear when the longitudinal axis of the solenoid coil is in line with the Noth South axis of Earth's Magnetic Field. Now you need to brush up on your home work Mr. Edison.

Synchro1 neither does the second video make any statement, claim or reference to the earth's magnetic field having any effect on his demonstration.

Sure, if he told you so I am sure you would repeat without question that Akula also genetically engineered replicant assistants to also help him assemble his test apparatus as a fact.  You have no evidence that Akula fabricated any ferrite pieces much less that they have any special properties.

Maybe you should brush up on what it takes to polarize and E/M field and why that might matter in an RF experiment.  Here is a clue for you:  When testing equipment for emissions, the equipment is placed on a table that is rotated through 360 degrees yaw and the receiving antenna is oriented in separate test runs horizontally and vertically.  The antenna is further situated at different heights with respect to the equipment being tested. 

[synchro1]

Synchro1 neither does the second video make any statement, claim or reference to the earth's magnetic field having any effect on his demonstration.

Sure, if he told you so I am sure you would repeat without question that Akula also genetically engineered replicant assistants to also help him assemble his test apparatus as a fact.  You have no evidence that Akula fabricated any ferrite pieces much less that they have any special properties.

Maybe you should brush up on what it takes to polarize and E/M field and why that might matter in an RF experiment.  Here is a clue for you:  When testing equipment for emissions, the equipment is placed on a table that is rotated through 360 degrees yaw and the receiving antenna is oriented in separate test runs horizontally and vertically.  The antenna is further situated at different heights with respect to the equipment being tested.

@MarkE,

What purpose do you think the paper with the directional N S E W co-ordinates under the coil serves? Dr. Stiffler hosted a 75 page thread on Energetic Forum you obviously never looked at either. Look at the 1st video in the series and see if you can understand what he's up to!

[MarkE]

@MarkE,

What purpose do you think the paper with the directional N S E W co-ordinates under the coil serves?

It put the thrill of magic into your heart.  Otherwise, for purposes of the demonstration it is just two orthogonal lines.  The demonstration did not show any change in behavior by altering the orientation with respect to those lines.  It did not show any correlation between those lines and the local magnetic field.  The demonstrator made no claims for any behavior that supposedly arose due to orientation with respect to those lines.  It seems that you weren't paying the kind of attention that you tell others to pay.

[synchro1]

It put the thrill of magic into your heart.  Otherwise, for purposes of the demonstration it is just two orthogonal lines.  The demonstration did not show any change in behavior by altering the orientation with respect to those lines.  It did not show any correlation between those lines and the local magnetic field.  The demonstrator made no claims for any behavior that supposedly arose due to orientation with respect to those lines.  It seems that you weren't paying the kind of attention that you tell others to pay.

@MarkE,

You're a Nincompoop!

[memoryman]

synchro1, you are really outdoing yourself in spurious remarks; do you have any REAL arguments?