Is Faraday´s Induction Law correct?

[forest]

however I see something interesting....all those theories assume a stream of inertial "something", particles or waves as a cause of magnetic field.When we use transformer we change magnetic field density or strength to induce EMF which would mean we speed  up inertial streams to get more field. That would never be OU as the same energy we get what we put into momentum of streams.
However if magnetic field is a stream, we can get it with very little work or even without work done like  in permanent magnets case.
If we have stable magnetic field and we cut it's streams with wire we diverge those streams around wire or drag them. . In fact in such case only Lenz law restrict the  amount of generated EMF.

[hanon]

I think that we just know the tip of the "Magnetism" iceberg. Until we do not know the foundation of Magnetism we won´t be able to derive new technology.

A very interesting video about Distinti´s theory which discredits the Faraday equation:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9vOoVfQRuv8

Regards

[hanon]

Hi all,

Here is another video from Distinti´s theory of electromagnetism.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Txd4G92Eno

Very interesting...  There are much more videos from Distinti in his Youtube channel and in his website (http://www.distinti.com/docs/):

http://www.distinti.com/docs/v1/ni.pdf

http://www.distinti.com/docs/ne.pdf

http://www.distinti.com/docs/nm.pdf

Are you still sure that our current accepted EM theory is completely fine?

[forest]

 It is known that Maxwell's electrodynamics—as usually understood at the present time—when applied to moving bodies, leads to asymmetries which do not appear to be inherent in the phenomena. Take, for example, the reciprocal electrodynamic action of a magnet and a conductor.


The observable phenomenon here depends only on the relative motion of the conductor and the magnet, whereas the customary view draws a sharp distinction between the two cases in which either the one or the other of these bodies is in motion. For if the magnet is in motion and the conductor at rest, there arises in the neighbourhood of the magnet an electric field with a certain definite energy, producing a current at the places where parts of the conductor are situated.

But if the magnet is stationary and the conductor in motion, no electric field arises in the neighbourhood of the magnet. In the conductor, however, we find an electromotive force, to which in itself there is no corresponding energy, but which gives rise—assuming equality of relative motion in the two cases discussed—to electric currents of the same path and intensity as those produced by the electric forces in the former case.

Examples of this sort, together with unsuccessful attempts to discover any motion of the earth relative to the "light medium," suggest that the phenomena of electrodynamics as well as of mechanics possess no properties corresponding to the idea of absolute rest.

— Albert Einstein, On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies^[24]

[hanon]

Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. New book

http://www.kathodos.com/magnetismsmall.pdf