Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1

Started by tarakan, June 12, 2014, 06:22:08 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

tarakan

Quote from: ARMCORTEX on June 14, 2014, 02:21:36 PM
Ok, I have designed amplifiers before, I have some college education in basic electronics, but I consider that mostly basic and easy. Like you my skill is self taught.

It looks like you have good logic and are clever individual, I doubt engineers will help you for ''free'', and alot of engineers would probably be unprepared for your task.

I trust you know how to program a microcontroller, and have good skill with non-programmable IC logic gates, the fastest I ever used were the 74LV series.

The thing you gotta know about VHF 100 MHZ and above is that you need specially designed stubs on a pcb, to avoid reflections, coaxial tubes, self made type high current.

You cannot poison your signal generator by your own radiation.

I have a good book from an ex-mit student that explains all the effects in simple terms, If you are interested let me know, you will learn about loci diagrams and propagation effects.

The logic circuit, looks doable, and you should be able to do this without too much complications if you make a good pcb, plz read about pcb design guidelines for high frequency.

This I understand so-so, I apply these rules a bit like voodoo, and ''covering all angles''. Most of the times it will be ok if you obey the rules.

The amplifiers, you will not be able to do properly without proper calculations, you may not even be able to measure what signal you got correctly, there will be complications.



Thank you.
Are there engineers on this forum?

I suspect that the absolute majority of well-paid electronic engineers that design this kind of circuitry bow their heads to the idols of the status quo and disregard overunity physics.

But I can always call this circuit a hobby RCL meter. Theoretically this concept can produce a very high end RCL meter.

I know that if I make this circuit run at 1GHz, I will need a lot of skills that I don't have. It would be nice if I get someone interested in the Ham Radio world where people optimize their antennas and try to make the most efficient morse code generators.

This could be a very good open-source project for the general public. If I do it, it will work at KHz frequencies and it won't be very helpful because I would not be able to test ferrite transformer Akula device-related things.

tarakan

Quote from: fritz on June 13, 2014, 10:19:00 AM
...There are lots of possibilities how to generate that pulses.
If you use an AVR 8Bit micro running @ 20MHz - you should be able to generate pulses in a 50ns frame.
You will need a little assembly coding - but should be not that complicated.
I actually work with a imx28 (freescale) linux board. This chip - or for example the imx 6 has some special ptp clock hardware which can operate up to 120 MHz.
You can generate pulses using the compare unit of those clock - and can generate pulses with 8.33ns precision.
The most versatile solution would be to use an fpga eval board.
This would give you almost any degree of freedom, just limited by the system clock.
What about simply using an AD DDS generator - and simply tuning mechnism - observing the resulting voltage ?
That should be possible even with an attiny controller.

rgds.

I would love to learn Assembly.
There is only so much my head can lean. I am learning advanced statistics and calculus beyond what I was taught in school.

I thought of using DDS,

But in every RCL circuit there is a slight correlation between amplitude and self-frequency. So in the function COS(X*C) * [decay part] C is not constant. It drifts up or down.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/oscda.html

I don't want to be another crazy overunity device inventor. (I am) I want to plant a seed of rationality, try to derive few common qualities that all OU devices have and make measurements. I KNOW that I am not going to be the lucky one who succeeds at replicating an OU device. Some organizations like CIA will always make sure that the circuits that are out there are not not the working ones. But they can't be too far from reality.

We need to be patient and to build mathematical and physics theory.

IF RCL circuits driven by impulses can give us overunity and this is a common hypothesis than lets make an effort to drive them in such way that this phenomenon can be observed.

FOR THIS I PROPOSE THE ABOVE MENTIONED RCL meter. It can be used for antenna calibration and other radio ham applications, can be commercialized.
Thank you!

tarakan

Nobody within the overunity community has taken the self-tuning approach to all the transformer devices?

So for the tesla hypothesis I need a transformer with a critically damped primary and an underdamped secondary. I have to keep the primary from oscillating...
So I need to release energy, than reabsorb it into my primary circuit or burn it off on a resistor and measure how much energy I burned.
But this is the analog part that I don't want to discuss.

I want to find the buffer and the frequency dividers so I can work with the basic RCL meter.

I want to start an online, laissez-faire institute of rational overunity studies.

Lets build the RCL meter-self tuning driver. Otherwise what makes an overunity enthusiast different from the alchemist of the late middle ages.
The former tries to empirically obtain overunity, the latter used to empirically try to derive gold from other elements of the Periodic table.
But dark ages have to end at some point...


tarakan

Quote from: ARMCORTEX on June 14, 2014, 02:21:36 PM
Ok, I have designed amplifiers before, I have some college education in basic electronics, but I consider that mostly basic and easy. Like you my skill is self taught.

It looks like you have good logic and are clever individual, I doubt engineers will help you for ''free'', and alot of engineers would probably be unprepared for your task.

I trust you know how to program a microcontroller, and have good skill with non-programmable IC logic gates, the fastest I ever used were the 74LV series.

The thing you gotta know about VHF 100 MHZ and above is that you need specially designed stubs on a pcb, to avoid reflections, coaxial tubes, self made type high current.

You cannot poison your signal generator by your own radiation.

I have a good book from an ex-mit student that explains all the effects in simple terms, If you are interrested let me know, you will learn about loci diagrams and propagation effects.

The logic circuit, looks doable, and you should be able to do this without too much complications if you make a good pcb, plz read about pcb design guidelines for high frequency.

This I understand so-so, I apply these rules a bit like voodoo, and ''covering all angles''. Most of the times it will be ok if you obey the rules.

The amplifiers, you will not be able to do properly without proper calculations, you may not even be able to measure what signal you got correctly, there will be complications.


I feel like I need to document this idea as an idea and let others do it.
I realized that I should use asynchronous communication between the Arduino and the buffer that positions a spike. This way I can specify when the spike should happen as a number of clock pulses until the next spike instead of placing this spike in time as a "1" in a row of "0"s.

I cannot pick the right ICs to do the job. All I can do is google datasheets and read them. But I cannot google special values like operation frequency of the IC. So I need to ask a professional that builds circuits at around 100 MHz - 1GHz. My circuit may have a commercial application of measuring RCL. It can be built under this cover. Sorry for repeating myself.

ARMCORTEX

Man that looks so boring with arduino.

Nonono.

ARM better!

Microchip better!