Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1

[tarakan]

I have to work. I work full time and go to college full time. I am taking summer classes. I have no time for free energy research.
Parts and a custom PCB are expensive.

Research is a very big venture, almost a gamble that I am not willing to play with my time. Status quo will not reward me for solving the myth. OU cannot be a facultative project. I haven't convinced anybody to build the circuit for RCL tests either.

So I gave up for a very good reason - I prioritize my immediate survival over OU research.

I cannot read 100 datasheets a day to see if there is a fit digital IC for my project and no one ever recommended me any ICs to meet the specs.

ALTECHLAB How do you know for sure ?

I think there are all signs that Akula is a faker :-)

Akula is a faker? His pot core transformer with two copper plates that surround the windings has an interesting characteristic and make very efficient Joule Thieves. (LaserHacker.com)Who came up with this transformer and what makes it so special? Numbers. Values.

Look at all the Ferroresonance experiments on You tube. If those videos weren't there, I would never have paid so much attention to the ferrite transformer OU.

[fritz]

So I gave up for a very good reason - I prioritize my immediate survival over OU research.

I´ll give you something on the way:
The basic idea to hunt for special properties using a one-fits-all auto-resonator is not stupid.
A tuneable, wideband negative resistor would be the easiest way to do it.
Increasing the negative resistance will finally lead to a self-resonant phenomenon at the most pleasant frequency - without any need for tuning.

The reason why nobody has done that before is - that wideband negative resistors or the stuff you proposed(and how it should work)  are way out of reach - even with extense effort.

Electrical oscillation is never ever a "scalar" thing - only in very rare circumstances you can treat it that way.
"ideal voltage source", "ideal current source", having exact zero or infinite source resistance.

In real world - you have at least 2 compounds - voltage and current - combined to an impedance - and if you increase the frequency - impedance matters.

This is why I never had your idea - because I see no practical way to build it.

Even if we would had such things - it mght be necessary to have an impedance-impedance which could be a thing with complex signal "a" modifying complex impedance Z with parameter x as function of ......
Things are not that simple and I basically aprecciate your effort trying to make us build such thing.
Because its a "kick" to think beyond limits.
Even if its out of reach.

The "impedance" thing is a quite serious issue with lots of overunity stuff - because there are often multiple degrees of freedom - and even if you replicate something in a very serious way - there is a multitude of possible outcome.

I have brilliant ideas on a daily basis - but the truth is - that the chance nobody was there before - is pretty small.
Sometimes the way I came there was unique, sometimes a detail was unique - sometimes I was "first" - but in the end somebody else has done it. (later). It might be difficult to get some reward for solving a myth, anyway.

rgds.

[tarakan]

I´ll give you something on the way:
The basic idea to hunt for special properties using a one-fits-all auto-resonator is not stupid.
A tuneable, wideband negative resistor would be the easiest way to do it.
Increasing the negative resistance will finally lead to a self-resonant phenomenon at the most pleasant frequency - without any need for tuning.

The reason why nobody has done that before is - that wideband negative resistors or the stuff you proposed(and how it should work)  are way out of reach - even with extense effort.

Electrical oscillation is never ever a "scalar" thing - only in very rare circumstances you can treat it that way.
"ideal voltage source", "ideal current source", having exact zero or infinite source resistance.

In real world - you have at least 2 compounds - voltage and current - combined to an impedance - and if you increase the frequency - impedance matters.

This is why I never had your idea - because I see no practical way to build it.

Even if we would had such things - it mght be necessary to have an impedance-impedance which could be a thing with complex signal "a" modifying complex impedance Z with parameter x as function of ......
Things are not that simple and I basically aprecciate your effort trying to make us build such thing.
Because its a "kick" to think beyond limits.
Even if its out of reach.

The "impedance" thing is a quite serious issue with lots of overunity stuff - because there are often multiple degrees of freedom - and even if you replicate something in a very serious way - there is a multitude of possible outcome.

I have brilliant ideas on a daily basis - but the truth is - that the chance nobody was there before - is pretty small.
Sometimes the way I came there was unique, sometimes a detail was unique - sometimes I was "first" - but in the end somebody else has done it. (later). It might be difficult to get some reward for solving a myth, anyway.

rgds.

We have multiple degrees of freedom but who said that there has to be only one "input impulse" and only one feedback line?

Their interrelationship will just be a matter of adding few lines into the code of the microcontroller.

What I had sketched was a 2D system. It considers time and power of only one line.
More feedback lines and more dimensions would make this system much more useful.


A team of several thousands of OU enthusiasts could tackle this problem instead of generating more and more content that restates the problem.

I can build this if I received help. There is nothing I can do about this circuit right now.

Negative resistance? Another analog approach? Why not use an analog double loop PLL than?
Things I propose are not that far out of reach. Someone with digital electronics design experience could make this. There isn't much to this circuit really.

[forest]

You told the truth. Free energy is simple but to work out the proof need a very wide range of freedom. Freedom from common dutes, work, health problems and so on...and a lot of money ,resources, friends who can help and have experience. That is the job for youngster having rich father or a bold person as a hobby...

[tarakan]

Ok. I live in Frederick MD, USA. This is an hour from Baltimore MD and from Washington DC.
If anyone is interested in working on this project, I can spend 1 day a week and drive no more than 1.5 hours in one direction.
Lets split assignments. I can work on studying the programming part, for example if there is somebody who is willing to do electronics.

Having a central, high speed CPU and many buffers and ripple counters may be a wise idea for multidimensional analysis of OU transformers.
We can make the project modular. The final product can be sold as an engineering tool for RCL analysis.