Skinner Vs John

[FreeEnergy]

Hi all it's been ages since I've logged in to this account and it's good to be back.
I have noticed both Skinner's and John's motor which has caught my attention.
Both seems promising and both use leverage to rotate a weight that is "always falling".
To me it seems John's idea is a lot easier to replicate and the input/output speed is the same which is great!
Skinner's seems more complex from the input perspective.
Also it seems Skinner has the most attention here but lets not forget John guys.
I really want to replicate John's idea first before I move to Skinner's.

John's: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DlVvyBickHE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0AsR126bSI
https://www.youtube.com/user/davidwjohn

Skinner's: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxIRaJlTD4Y
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JolNozy8UEY&list=UU-41VqjATdRAlN7ztX8S30A
https://www.youtube.com/user/aaronmurakami

[AB Hammer]

Welcome back FreeEnergy

I like Skinner's better for it seems to be more efficient and counter balances itself to keep in in one place without shaking apart in time.  IMHO


Alan

[FreeEnergy]

Thanks AB Hammer.

So it looks like no one is replicating John's device so far or is there? anyone?

Since there are a few replicas already taking place for Skinner's device I'd also love to see John's as well.
Either way whichever one works will do for me. 

[alfilmx]

I do not think Jhon device has a future as try to put the engine load collapses