Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[MileHigh]

Everything I stated in my previous posting is true.

Wow, something that looks like a vortex in a test tube.  How do you expect anybody to comment on what you are showing if you don't fully describe the experiment and what you are doing?

"Special solution?"  "Special suspension?"  "Something else you won't describe?"  So it's all a big secret?

You are not proving anything with the test tubes because you refuse to tell your audience about the experiment yet you attempt to offer that as proof?

You are absolutely failing to argue many of your points with any logic, reason, facts, or experimental data that is correctly described and interpreted.  Instead you play the high-strung bombastic "mad scientist."

Every single one of your supposed proofs has a logical explanation.  I am confident enough to state that without seeing them.

MileHigh

[MileHigh]

I explained it perfectly, ....that you DONT ACCEPT the answer, is not the same as  "DIDN'T answer".

Here is your "explanation:"

You see, son, I actually DO the experiments, you think you understand but you dont.

IF placed ONLY on the centrifugal edge you will GET NO BRIGHT SPOT IN THE CENTER, absolutely NOTHING.      

however you can see that in an upcoming video.   I love they way you assume things.   The bright spot in the center, son, only appears when there is a centripetal magnetic vortex present.

And ONLY then.

I have news for you.  The people that read this forum, even the rabid believers, are not totally retarded.  The fact is that you didn't answer.  I conclude that the reason for your failure to explain the black voids is because you simply don't know the answer.  That means behind all of your bluster is a little scared guy that is afraid to show that he is human and doesn't have the knowledge, education, and experience to demonstrate that he really and truly knows what he is talking about.  It's a dichotomy that you have to deal with and it must cause you some stress.  Just how long can you be "On" before you get exhausted I wonder.

MileHigh

[TheoriaApophasis]

Everything I stated in my previous posting is true.

Sorry, this slot machine doesn't accept CLAIMS.

Wow, something that looks like a vortex in a test tube. 

"wow", son, isnt a rebuttal, its a statement of stupor.

Actually if you have your eye close against same, you can see the vortex movement. AND likewise, just like a waterspout, the inner vortex which looks identical to the pic below:

"Special solution?"  "Special suspension?"  "Something else you won't describe?"  So it's all a big secret?

Since you've never invented anything, let me tell you how it works.  Generally (always) when people invent something NEW, they dont tell anyone about the specifics until there is patent or rights protection.

Typically people spend a LOT OF TIME creating things, and after doing so, they dont give away the information on their inventions (until protected)

Maybe you should go look that fact up in the "Dictionary of Insanely Obvious Facts"

You are not proving anything with the test tubes

Nice claim,  however the video and the invention speaks for itself.   If you were here, you could demo it yourself.

Tell you what son,  whats more plausible, my video proof and pics or your lips flapping?   Yes, thats right.

You want a FAST duplication of this effect of my invention?  Use 1 teaspoon of salt in a test tube, hot water, bring it to FULL saturation.... and 10 drops of ferrofluid in the tube.   The effect is VERY FAST, but also the same.
Now, go test it yourself, son.

experimental data that is correctly described and interpreted.

Small error son, the ONLY person here doing EXPERIMENTS, is myself.   

Unless you think your lip flapping is , what,......an experiment itself?

[john_doe]

I've spent quite a bit of money experimenting with magnets for some time now and I've come to similar conclusions as Theoria.

The three things I'd like to mention that some may not know:

A: The magnetic "field" isn't static in repeatable experiments conducted by Eugene Podkletnov.
B: This "field" "seems to affect objects at a distance at a speed of 64c." IE: 64x the speed of light.  (No wonder it appears "static")
C: OverUnity is valid science and is being investigate by ALL astrophysicist........ Although they simply call it "Big Bang Theory". Yes, the fact the universe is expanding at an ever increasing speed confirms OverUnity to me. (Though additional energy could be "leaking" through from other dimensions.)

Some have said this thread isn't what this forum is about, I disagree. The better understanding we have about magnetism, mass, speed, doh'nuts, votexs, vortices and such the better. I'd like to suggest people watch the Discovery channel's "The Universe" series and pay particular attention to the Black Hole episode. There is far more information in the accurate representation of what a Supermassive Blackhole does to a star than many will realise.
I believe the secret to "OverUnity" "free energy" (in the broad sense) is hiding in recreating a magnetic scale model of our galaxy. Easily achieved if we had a better understanding of magnetism.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Here is your "explanation:"

Actually, son, it isnt,  go further back in this thread.


Nice strawman fallacy.


Magnetism displaces dielectricity, son.   

A fact WELL KNOWN and talked much about by Tesla, JC Maxwell, Heaviside, and CP Steinmentz.

I see you have ABSOLUTELY NO grasp of electromagnetism to take this nonsense position. 


.....Same reason there is a multi-layered circular corona effect pictured below.


Now, son, lets see if you can explain the "EGG" shaped distortion picture below.       I can,  lets see if YOU CAN


(hint: its very simple if you have common sense and know ANYTHING about magnetism and dielectricity at conjugate angles).