Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

"blooming" will be in a very similar direction to the magnetic field.
MileHigh

WHICH magnetic field?   EACH "pole" has TWO MAGNETIC Vortex movements,  centrifugal and centripetal


Even $5 field viewing film will show you this much simplicity. 

[TheoriaApophasis]

I am only considering why the PM created a vortex and the EM did not in Tinman's video

That was explained several pages ago, you either   


A: dont believe it (typical)

B: didnt read it



As for TINMANS VIDEO HERE:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-37Ecjd7FQQ&list=UUsLiBC2cL5GsZGLcj2rm-4w


since hydrogen is diamagnetic, SAME as pyrolytic graphite
it will always move OPPOSITE the movement of the magnetism OR OPPOSITE the direction you are dragging the diamagnetic material.....such as the pyrolytic graphite in the test tube  .

SO, while he is (of course) getting CCW off the "N POLE" as per the hydrogen, the N POLE centrifugal magnetism is moving CW (and the N pole centripetal is CCW),  and as necessitated and must be the case, the diamagnetic hydrogen moves CCW to the CW centrifugal N pole of the magnet


for proof of this using pyrolytic graphite (super diamagnetic),....see here:::

see example here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6je5P1BOp3A

[picowatt]

That was explained several pages ago, you either   


A: dont believe it (typical)

B: didnt read it

I'll ask once again.  Are you saying that taping the sides of the neo will not produce any change in the observed vortex in Tinman's upcoming video?

[MileHigh]

Brad:

There is a logical follow-up experiment that will just reinforce what PW already stated.  What you want to do is make an electromagnet that allows the current to "bloom" out of the entire metal cylinder.

So as a suggestion, take the metal cylinder and wrap a single spiral of insulated magnet wire around where you leave a decent and noticeable gap between each turn of the spiral.  You could tack down each end of the magnet wire using Krazy Glue or something.  Now when you repeat the experiment, the electric current will be able to "bloom" off of a large portion of the metal cylinder.  Thus you will now have a setup where the current "bloom" off of the regular cylindrical magnet and the current "bloom" off of the metal cylinder of the electromagnet will be very similar.  Therefore you can expect to see a vortex in the electrolyte for the electromagnet and it will be approximately the same as the vortex you get with the magnet.

There you go, that's real science for you.

MileHigh

[TheoriaApophasis]

I'll ask once again.  Are you saying that taping the sides of the neo will not produce any change in the observed vortex in Tinman's upcoming video?

Let me give you a clue AGAIN- 

"magnets" are CREATED by discharging capacitor banks THRU THE (pre-) "POLES" (at which time they are of course "PRE-magnetized [rather pre-dielectrified]" ceramics),

Also at which time, they are merely the geometric faces MEANT for polarization resultant from changing the magneto-dielectric geometry of the entire piece(s) from the discharge placed thru them, ,of which, a portion is retained.      Ergo, the 'permanent' magnet.


see below: