Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

SeaMonkey:
and people deserve to hear both sides in a debate.
MileHigh

You have yet to say ANYTHING,   earlier your admit to being a keyboard jockey.

You dont experiment,

you dont invent,

You dont CREATE anything,

You dont sit down with a voltmeter and wind coils, and do experiments, and look into new research or ideas,

You dont use the Platonic methodology of EITHER induction or the most important one, retroduction.



you merely state over and over  "thats wrong,  thats wrong"      That, son, is a fallacy.



1 page ago you said you were an "expert on the bedini motor"  and that you "NEVER BUILT ONE"     


How proud that must make you             I mean lazy and shiftless.

[gravityblock]

True, the centrifugal magnetism is being 'driven' by the dielectrical inertial plane at the midpoint of every magnet.

Yes, this centrifugal is a "FAKE" inertial force.

magnetism is definitionally radiation of and within the magneto-dielectric inter-atomic, a  "magnet" only makes this fundamental Aether force VERY APPARENT to us dumb human critters.

The centrifugal force is described by classical mechanics as being a fictitious or fake inertial force as you agree.  The Coriolis force is also described by classical mechanics as being a fictitious force.  The Euler force is once again described by classical mechanics as being a fictitious force.  Together, these three fictitious forces are necessary for the formulation of correct equations of motion in a rotating reference frame.  Without these three fictitious forces, classical mechanics can't properly describe motion in a rotating reference frame (see snapshot below).  Physics also speaks of virtual photons, etc.  Below is a snapshot at wiki on the "Fictitious Forces".  Both classical mechanics and quantum mechanics can't properly describe this universe as being real, however it can easily describe this universe as being a holographic computer simulation (a non-local universe).  There is only one thing in this universe that is real, and that is Spirit/Consciousness!  Everything else is an illusion!  The Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics is based on what appears to be the same nutbar logic as classical mechanics (fictitious or virtual forces, virtual particles, etc).  Once we realize science has nothing to bring forth that is real, then we can move onto the next level of technological advances.

Pilot-wave theory makes all the same predictions as the probabilistic formulation of quantum mechanics (which wouldn't be referred to as the "Copenhagen" interpretation until the 1950s), but without the ghostliness or mysterious collapse.  It is the Copenhagen probabilistic interpretation of QM I do not agree with.  The old, deterministic alternative of QM is not mentioned in most textbooks and most people in the field haven't heard of it.  Sheldon Goldstein, a professor of mathematics, physics, and philosophy at Rutgers University and a supporter of pilot-wave theory, blames the "preposterous" neglect of the theory on "decades of indoctrination."  At this stage, Goldstein and several other noted researchers risk their careers by questioning quantum orthodoxy.  The physicist David Bohm resurrected pilot-wave theory in a modified form in 1952, with Einstein's encouragement, and made clear that it did work, but it never caught on.  The theory is also known as de Broglie-Bohm theory, or Bohmian mechanics.  Please remember, according to David Bohm, the one who resurrected pilot-wave theory in a modified form in 1952, also says the entire universe is a hologram.

By 1932, when the Hungarian-American mathematician John von Neumann claimed to have proven that the probabilistic wave equation in quantum mechanics could have no "hidden variables" (that is, missing components, such as de Broglie's particle with its well-defined trajectory), pilot-wave theory was so poorly regarded that most physicists believed von Neumann's proof without even reading a translation.  More than 30 years would pass before von Neumann's proof was shown to be false, but by then the damage was done.  Later, the Northern Irish physicist John Stewart Bell went on to prove a seminal theorem that many physicists today misinterpret as rendering hidden variables impossible.  But Bell supported pilot-wave theory. He was the one who pointed out the flaws in von Neumann's original proof.  And in 1986 he wrote that pilot-wave theory "seems to me so natural and simple, to resolve the wave-particle dilemma in such a clear and ordinary way, that it is a great mystery to me that it was so generally ignored."  The neglect continues to this day.....

Now at last, pilot-wave theory may be experiencing a minor comeback — at least, among fluid dynamicists. "I wish that the people who were developing quantum mechanics at the beginning of last century had access to these experiments," Milewski said. "Because then the whole history of quantum mechanics might be different." The experiments began a decade ago, when Yves Couder and colleagues at Paris Diderot University discovered that vibrating a silicon oil bath up and down at a particular frequency can induce a droplet to bounce along the surface. The droplet's path, they found, was guided by the slanted contours of the liquid's surface generated from the droplet's own bounces — a mutual particle-wave interaction analogous to de Broglie's pilot-wave concept.

The photon carries momentum. The Heisenberg uncertainty principle states that it is not possible to measure location and momentum at the same time. If the momentum is distributed throughout the entire volume, if one measures the entire momentum, the whole volume must be considered. Since the volume spreads all over creation, it is impossible to say that it is located at a point.  It seems that the meaning of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle can be reinterpreted to support the present conclusion of the nature of the photon. If it has aperture and length, the momentum is not located at a single point. If a single point is assumed for the structure, no momentum can be measured. It seems that the significance of the uncertainty principle has been highly overrated.  The Heisenberg uncertainty principle simply says that the photon has volume.  Calculation shows that the energy and thus the mass is distributed uniformly throughout the structure. The same fact applies to the distribution of momentum.  Quantum indeterminacy and a probabilistic universe based on the wrong assumptions of the Copenhagen interpretation has been proven false!

"The old has been made new again"

Reference:  Fluid Experiments Support Deterministic "Pilot-Wave" Quantum Theory (Snapshots shown below)

Gravock

[TheoriaApophasis]

these three fictitious forces, classical mechanics can't properly describe motion in a rotating reference frame (see snapshot below).  Physics also speaks of virtual photons, etc.  Below is a snapshot at wiki on the "Fictitious Forces".  Both classical mechanics and quantum mechanics can't properly describe this universe as being real, however it can easily describe this universe as being a holographic computer simulation (a non-local universe).  There is only one thing in this universe that is real, and that is Spirit/Consciousness!

yes, yes, all true.   However you should never read anything from the Cult of Quantum, is a mind virus and mental disease.

These sick SOB's are nothing more than rehashed Greek Atomists

Tesla attacked them endless as being mental defectives, which they ARE,  They're literally intellectual SLIME and BLACK MOLD.


"Where common sense and intuition failed, we (the insane relativists) had to create a new form of intuition based upon abstract
(unreal) mathematics. When common sense fails, we must create uncommon sense." -Leonard Susskind, professor theoretical
physics, and priest of the cult of Quantum

Quantum insanity: "Everything we call real is made up of things that cannot be real." – N. Bohr

Quantum insanity: "The more you see how strange nature behaves, the harder it is for us to make a model that explains even the how
the most simple phenomena works. Theoretical physics has given up on this pursuit." – R. Feynman

They create a new Unicorn particle every time they need their  BS formulas to balance out !!!!!

Muons, gluons, mesons, bosons. etc etc   pixie dust and BS


de Broglie was a mental midget, he made a 1000 claims, with no logic for most of them.


You said----
""""The photon carries momentum"""""

There is no such thing as a photon,  this is a BS misunderstanding of the nature of TEM   (see last section of my book).

However IT (not a photon however) caries momentum, because, (of course) its the radial dielectric component of TEM



You said---
""""the momentum is not located at a single point."""""

Thats right, because the DIELECTRIC RADIAL COMPONENT is pulsed directly in line with the wavelength of the TEM

which is why SHORT wavelength EM is so dangerous and powerful.

[gravityblock]

yes, yes, all true.   However you should never read anything from the Cult of Quantum, is a mind virus and mental disease.

Quantum insanity: "Everything we call real is made up of things that cannot be real." – N. Bohr

You said----
""""The photon carries momentum"""""

There is no such thing as a photon,  this is a BS misunderstanding of the nature of TEM   (see last section of my book).

However IT (not a photon however) caries momentum, because, (of course) its the radial dielectric component of TEM

Call a photon whatever you like, but it doesn't change what it is!  Listen to what you are saying!  You don't believe in photons, electrons, etc., yet you can call them by a different name, then they all of a sudden become real to you!  This falls under the same nutbar logic of quantum insanity: "everything we call real is made up of things that cannot be real"!

Time should play the part instead of meters or distance. We should look upon Time as the result of the force that impels a body through space. The greater the force, the shorter the time, and the shorter also the space to be traversed. Thus, if the force were infinitely great, time and space would be infinitely small, they would cease to exist. If the force was infinitely small, time and space would be infinitely great. But, again the force is not everything, because in reality it does not exist. All that exists is the impulse that is applied to the body in space and imparts momentum to it. The body's movement is then only limited by the resistance it has to overcome. What does exist then is the momentum that arises from the impulse of the force, and not the force itself.

Gravock

[gravityblock]

Using a lens with a micron thin layer of sandwiched ferro fluid to map external magnetic fields via optic affects of the field on the magnetic fluid. Red, yellow and green radial LED's are spaced evenly; facing inward into the edge of the lens. The light from the LED's warps around the magnets as it passes through the fluid. This is the basic version video with one magnet from youtube user, SirZerp.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lD6C6f2nu0U

Check out SirZerp's Channel for more videos on viewing the magnetic fields in real time, they are much better than the "basic version video", and here his more information about this technique, http://www.scribd.com/doc/28943933/Photographing-Magnetic-Lines-of-Constant-Scalar-Potential

The Dynamic Etalon is another method, and was conceived and developed as an economical tool for magnetic research.  Basically, this unique lens is a Fabry-Perot Interferometer combined with a modified Hele-Shaw cell. The nano particle mixture within the lens respond dynamically in the presence of a magnetic field.

A real-time holographic representation of magnetic flux is clearly visible to the observer or image recorder, unlike a typical computer generated pattern plotted by software. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=byxCYvDjFRM

Here is more information on the Dynamic Etalon method, http://www.nanomagnetics.us/dynamic%20etalon.htm

Gravock