Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

Ken
That"s the _money shot
You in NYC ATM ?

No, in Ft. Myers Florida not far from Sanibel Island,  Also I live up north (well, kinda up north).    I cant stand the rainy season right now at my home in Ft. Myers  .......rains non stop for 4 months

Well, I have a 3 chip camcorder, I was going to use that for the video, but i need the LARGER DEMO back from my associate I created that hes testing.

Hes testing it for cold and heat, and how it holds up, before we can consider marketing it.

Ive made 2 diff. types of field demo fluids, but they get RUINED if they get too hot.......that also ruins their potential for marketability.
My fave is the ALCOHOL based one above, (not for vortex however), but DONT get it hot, or it will ruin it.   Leave it in a hot car, etc....

But, hell, theyre only $1 each to make.

[ramset]

Ken
not trying to mess with your lively hood ,its just that I love tools and measurement


and this fluid will help us to see the fields in motion  and how they react to experiments.


that makes it a tool  and


priceless............


thx
Chet

[wattsup]

@TA

This is my last post on this thread because I see you are on a cloud, looking at things but not understanding why they do what they do, and, even when one attempts to explain, you just ignore everything is if nothing was said. So it is obvious you really do not want to talk shop with anyone serious and would prefer to entertain the masses. David Copperfield did that well indeed creating illusions and calling them magic.

So you have a tube with fluid and magnetic particles that are on the top of your vial and by GRAVITY mass starts to fall but since it is in such a confided are, the falling particles displace fluid that has no other place to go then up. But once the particles get near enough to the magnet, then, call it "magnetic attraction" is pulling on those particles so you get a fine line going down while the fluid is still displaced going up.

You must have needed just enough dust to reach a critical point to produce the effect otherwise to little dust and that smaller trailer would  have fallen down so fast and to much dust and the shown effect would have been too short. So I am sure you played around with the quantity in the vial to get this effect going.

Hmmmmm. You obviously don't know who I am.

That's it man. Tell me, if you leave the tube like that, will all the particles eventually fall to the base of the tube? Yes they will. So where is the force you are talking about creating an upwards vortex. If there was an upward vortex, there should be a vortex rising well above when all the particles are down. There is none. Your optics is just based on what you want to see and not what is really going on. Same goes with the TV patterns of a magnet. They are not magnetic patterns, they are TV patterns when an equal force is applied at one spot (black) onto the pixels and the variable is only angularity from that point outwards. Same goes for your space/field conjectures. So for me, you have nothing man. You obviously did not do your homework and your exposé is just a rabid attempt at plugging all the holes your ideas have generated and from there you will be plugging holes for a long long time to come.

Funny thing though, a theory is supposed to dispel previous notions or clarify present notions or create a new notion. Unfortunately none of that is possible here so for that reason, since time is money, "I'm out". 

I'd rather live in the real world then your world of "freebyisms".

wattsup

PS: I am very disappointed that you did not wind up being someone I could talk to. I have been looking for someone with enough brains to do just that, but, too bad for that. And yeh yeh, I know, I'm the problem because you iz so perfect. Enjoy yourself.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Ken
not trying to mess with your lively hood ,its just that I love tools and measurement
and this fluid will help us to see the fields in motion  and how they react to experiments.
priceless............
Chet

Oh no, no worries, you're fine.    My NEW solution to show magnetic vortex movement last night still works great

BUT i need to heat test it a bit, otherwise I cannot market it.


however, it works perfect because it creates VERY FINE loooooong thin strings as it flows to the magnetic centripetal, and thats awesome for showing vortex movement.


Awesome time !!   

[TheoriaApophasis]

@TA
This is my last post on this thread because I see you are on a cloud, looking at things but not understanding

Nice BS claim.    Have any videos or logic or proof to backup that BS?

why they do what they do, and, even when one attempts to explain, you just ignore everything is if nothing was said. So it is obvious you really do not want to talk shop with anyone serious and would prefer to entertain the masses. David Copperfield did that well indeed creating illusions and calling them magic.

Ohhhhhhhhh so now Im a fucking ILLUSIONIST out to mind-scr3w people?          ~~~~~~~~~~~Ahhhhhhhhhh    Another NICE  F-ing claim.

Yeah, I spent ALL those years waiting just to TRICK YOU FOLKS.      STFU loser. 

I do the work and experiments, I have both the logic, the proof AND THE RESULTS,       you have  JACK SH*T 


Magic tricks my goddamn ass boy.    I guess you think I mined SCR3WED  TinMan too?   AND his video results??

Demented  POS.

So you have a tube with fluid and magnetic particles that are on the top of your vial and by GRAVITY mass starts to fall but since it is in such a confided are, the falling particles displace fluid that has no other place to go then up. But once the particles get near enough to the magnet, then, call it "magnetic attraction" is pulling on those particles so you get a fine line going down while the fluid is still displaced going up. 

I currently have 13 diff. testing METHODS, moron.      Not "A TUBE"     Got that son???

Son, boy,   I use PLENTY OF METHODS that have NOTHING to with A: zapped magnets    OR   B: fluid suspensions.

Again, shut your hole.     You have BS claims and NOTHING MORE, go sit and spin on them.

Hmmmmm. You obviously don't know who I am.

Yes I do, youre the fucking idiot that thinks Im an "Illusionist" out to trick people........   just like Tinman and HIS VIDEOS HE DID HIMSELF

Shut your hole.

You DONT HAVE:
logic
proof
evidence
You dont have ANYTHING to back up your half-ass claims



Illusionist,  I REALLY LIKE THAT ONE.................   Demented intellectual PEDOPHILE.........I KNEW given enough time, one of you demented bastards would call me a "magician / Illusionist"

I know 100%  how  Skepticism works, how SOPHISTRY WORKS.

As a consumate expert of Platonism, translator of ancient Greek, expert on PLOTINUS, PROCLUS, DAMASCIUS, SYRIANUS, their works, and their methods, and all the various types of Skepticism, and Atomism they dealt with, I know EVERY SINGLE rancid angle you have, or WILL have , or could have.

That's it man. Tell me, if you leave the tube like that, will all the particles eventually fall to the base of the tube? Yes they will. So where is the force you are talking about creating an upwards vortex. If there was an upward vortex, there should be a vortex rising well above when all the particles are down. There is none. Your optics is just based on what you want to see and not what is really going on. Same goes with the TV patterns of a magnet. They are not magnetic patterns, they are TV patterns when an equal force is applied at one spot (black) onto the pixels and the variable is only angularity from that point outwards. Same goes for your space/field conjectures. So for me, you have nothing man. You obviously did not do your homework and your exposé is just a rabid attempt at plugging all the holes your ideas have generated and from there you will be plugging holes for a long long time to come.

Youre forgetting ONE IMPORTANT FACT ASSHOLE, they are not just coming down, but coming down in a CW vortex  OR a CCW vortex (depending on polarity)
That ends that horseshit.

Too bad your goddamn premise about the CRT TUBE  doesn't explain  CW on the centrifugal and CCW on the centripetal ON ONE FACE of the magnet !!!!!!!!  ROFL !!!!!!

One could postulate it as correct if it was ALL MOVING in one direction, but not BOTH inversely at the SAME TIME

So much for that rancid BS.

You flap your fucking lips,  I DO the experiments, .....and there are PLENTY MORE I have not mentioned here due to seeking potential patent rights.
You're nothing but tits on a bull, ....useless

PS: I am very disappointed that you did not wind up being someone I could talk to. I have been looking for someone with enough brains to do just that, but, too bad for that. And yeh yeh, I know, I'm the problem because you iz so perfect. Enjoy yourself.

I am very disappointed that you dont have a brain.   You are yet another skeptical LOSER in the CULT OF QUANTUM.

Actually Im not, I dont give a damn   

If I had a 10000 testing methods , youd say "ohhh, well that doesnt prove shit"



I know your type son.  Ive been debating Greek Metaphysics, and translating Prakrit for almost 15 years now, and debated the BEST MINDS alive on highly abstruse topics of nonlinear inductive reasoning and complex topics in Platonic philosophy.

That translates into:   "I can run circles around your ass in ANY debate you want".   

However LOGIC, PROOF, RESULTS, and EXPERIMENTS matter.........the rest is just you flapping your pathetic lips