Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

..

Magnetism is radiation by definition.

its the conjugate necessitated discharge co-eternal principle of dielectricity AND the terminus of electricity.

But , as IS ABSOLUTE FACT, Phi x Psi = Q,   Electricity , being an Ether modality is the  Ether in dynamic polarization, AS SUCH it is more accurate to say that , rather than Electricity TERMINATING INTO Magnetism, it is correct to say that Electricity loses its charging nature, or half-component of dielecticity due to:
A: dissipation
B: coil formations   ....induction,
etc.


That BOTH electricity and gravity mass have MUTUAL co-principles of BOTH dielectricity AND magnetism is NO coincidence, they are both the by-products of magneto-dielectricity in formation (and degeneration)  .......(chart below).


Harvesting the pressure velocities (at the centrifugal point) of magnetism, Im afraid, is like squeezing a balloon in a PINCH,  you got MORE on one end, hurray, but less on the other, the field pressure mediation is instant and unavoidable.


Maxwell called magnetism the "field of dielectricity"
Dielectricity in discharge = magnetism
Discharge = polarization = radiation = space (itself) = divergence
All generation must terminate, that termination MUST be curvilinear, circular


necessitated curvilinear discharge is only due to both charge and discharge operating on (rather off) the same universal fulcrum, the Ether itself sans perturbation.

Why cant people make things simple ,  Space is the product of discharge, of radiation, of magnetism which gives volume to the entire universe.

Electricity NOR dielectricity give any VOLUME (=polarization) to any part of the universe,   Even in galactic formations where the fundamental particle is created, its spin immediately produces its atomic volume in picometers due to discharge/magnetism/polarization/space (all one and the same thing)




All magnetism is necessitated radiation, is divergent,    Gravity/mass is HALF dielectric and HALF magnetism, which is why it is spatially accumulative but counterspatial in field.
Electricity is HALF dielectric, and HALF magnetism, which is why it is spatially polarized and but counterspatial in principle




Ether is the Ether is the Ether,     ........to claim magnetism, gravity, dielectricity and electricity as 4 wholly DIFFERENT things (ultimately) , is senseless and impossible.




If ORIGAMI /paper can teach you anything,  you can turn mere paper into either a deadly weapon, or something soft enough to wipe your nuggets with.

[MasterPlaster]

Miles,

Some of your utterances are simply inexplicable!  You're
obviously a mature man with what seems a childish
sense of superiority blended with a profound fear of
being perceived as less knowledgeable than your
adversaries.

Or, should we say, your "targets?"

Why you expend so much energy in pursuit of drama
is an intriguing proposition, to say the least. .........................

You are too kind in your summation of what you are observing.
The nature of the attacks on Ken look more like the works of paid disinformation agents. After all why would a creative person
spend his time instead of developing his own work trying to demolish someone else's? This also applies to people who have
no thought of their own. The word jealousy comes to mind.

[tinman]

OK-well i said i was out,but this deserves to be right here.

Tonight i have confirmed that there is two vortex spins that are opposite to one another. So in my case(my setup as seen in video)the right hand rule dosnt seem to apply to one of the two situations of my setup. Im not sure that this would be the case in a standard homopolar motor setup,but in the water test setup of mine,i can (with out a doubt) confirm that there is defently two spins that apose one another. This seems to confirm TA's picture below.

I think this one is the money shot guy's.Maybe it's time to open your minds.
I am uploading the video now,and will post it here in this thread as soon as it's done. In the mean time,i am going to the work shop,and shooting another video with fixed magnets. First will be with the tape around the magnet,and then i will remove the tape,and run the test again.I will also use a compass to show the field is the same,and a volt meter so as you can see the polarity hasnt been changed.

[TheoriaApophasis]

I think this one is the money shot guy's.Maybe it's time to open your minds.
I am uploading the video now,and will post it here in this thread as soon as it's done. In the mean time,i am going to the work shop,and shooting another video with fixed magnets. First will be with the tape around the magnet,and then i will remove the tape,and run the test again.I will also use a compass to show the field is the same,and a volt meter so as you can see the polarity hasnt been changed.

Awesome work!!!! 

Great stuff.


As a note, I keep forgetting that most everyone looks at polarization TOP DOWN rather than how I always look at spin direction which is HOW it is (before it breaks the surface) leaving....., which is from the 'inside OUT' on a magnet, so I need to amend that picture to avoid confusion.

N pole is CCW looking down, from HOW it LEAVES the magnet itself , it is CW ........as such, to avoid ANY confusion, I amended that diagram. >>>>

[TheoriaApophasis]

You really wanna blow your mind,          ......(yes, Rawles and Davis reported on this 30 years ago)

Watch how much faster SEEDS sprout and grow if placed on top of a LARGE MAGNET SOUTH POLE than on the north pole.


North pole growing Alfalfa sprouts sprout SLOWER, WEAKER, and more PUNY than South Pole exposed alfalfa ..........(just one example)

HOW RADICAL a difference you ask?           >>>>>>>>>>>   A LOT <<<<<<<<<<<<
I have done the experiment many times, heres yet another example pictured below Im doing.

Think Im lying, anyone here TRY IT YOURSELF.......... always works.......see pic below,  UNDER THE CLOTH (you cannot see) is a big 2 inch by 2 inch by 1 inch magnet



You cannot really tell at this angle, but the GREEN (south pole) spouts have a LOT more volume and are more robust and bigger, and when they start growing, the first 2 days, they are ALLLLLLLWAYS much faster
(a LOT FASTER)
And..............if you expose tomato seeds to the North pole for a couple days (before planting), you end up with tomatoes that have VERY LOW ACID content.     (test it yourself).

I know the reason WHY this happens (and have proof) in seeds and plants, but I wont publish it until the 3rd edition of the book.