2 New Important Web Sites Launched

[Cap-Z-ro]

If there's one thing I've learned in this life, its never make eye contact with a drunk or a loon.

We may be dealing with both here...

Regards...

[Madebymonkeys]

If there's one thing I've learned in this life, its never make eye contact with a drunk or a loon.

We may be dealing with both here...

Regards...

You're dealing with neither.
I only posed a simple question to you about something which you are, obviously, quite passionate about.

Anyhow, for the benefit of everyone else, how do you negate the risks of the dangers discussed thus far?
If not for me, it's surely a good thing to let your followers know?

Now, I suspect we may have a problem with the above questions...because:
A) They are valid questions.
B) You don't have an answer.
C) Your only option, due to A) and B), is to call me a troll, cow, sheep or well-paid shill.

[Cap-Z-ro]

Another thing I've learned in life is that when someone's first communication to you is an ad hominem attack...they've just told you who and what they are.


The same old same old troll/shill tactic is the "serious question" to draw you in.

They really hate when you out them for that tactic...take all the wind (read flatulence)
out of their 'sales'.

Next troll/account.

Regards...

[Cap-Z-ro]

Word has it that the house of cards of the Zionist Tyrants ZT's (the i is silent) is about to collapse.

And in synchronistic like fashion, this just appeared in my inbox...


The results of the six sodium fluoride samples are shown here in parts per billion (ppb)

MAX aluminum: 283,218 ppb
MAX arsenic: 137 ppb
MAX strontium: 9417 ppb
MAX lead: 988 ppb
MAX uranium: 1415 ppb
MAX tungsten: presence confirmed in 2 of 6 samples but quantitative analysis not conducted on tungsten

AVG aluminum: 69364 ppb
AVG arsenic: 70 ppb
AVG strontium: 1751 ppb
AVG lead: 299 ppb
AVG uranium: 239 ppb

Learn more:  http://www.naturalnews.com

/046227_fluoride_heavy_metals_contamination_lab_test_results.html#ixzz390SSNlyh



Regards...


[/color]

[orbut 3000]

It looks like not everyone thinks that 'Naturalnews' is a reliable source:


http://bigthink.com/neurobonkers/who-do-you-know-who-believes-in-the-most-deadly-kind-of-pseudoscience


Interesting read.