Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


Conical Pulley Drive results in overunity?

Started by vineet_kiran, July 28, 2014, 11:44:13 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

MarkE

vineet, you are once again destroying your own claims.  The fibers are there to limit stretching.  Stretching is bad for efficiency.  It is bad for reliability.  Your scheme forces continuous stretch and relaxation as each portion of the belt circles the conical capstan. 

Your scheme does not introduce extra energy into the system.  It only costs efficiency in power lost to stretching and relaxing the belt.

vineet_kiran

Quote from: MarkE on July 29, 2014, 01:23:48 AM
vineet, you are once again destroying your own claims.  The fibers are there to limit stretching.  Stretching is bad for efficiency.  It is bad for reliability.  Your scheme forces continuous stretch and relaxation as each portion of the belt circles the conical capstan. 

Your scheme does not introduce extra energy into the system.  It only costs efficiency in power lost to stretching and relaxing the belt.


You keep on saying same thing again and again.  Same thing you did on the other thread also. That's why I stopped responding to that thread.  Why to make nonsense arguments -  Please leave it.

I can do some other constructive work than arguing with you.

Have a nice time.   Goodbye.

MarkE

I am sorry that you do not understand basic mechanics.  I have tried to politely explain the reality to you.  You can always attempt to build one of your ideas and find out how your beliefs hold-up in the real world.

Newton II

Vineet, MarkE,  I think you both are superficial cranks.  (sorry to say that)

The top portion of the cone describes bigger diameter, so it will move with greater speed than bottom portion of cone having smaller diameter.  This will result in two different velocities of the belt at top and bottom portion.  Which in turn may result in slipping or distortion of belt at top portion because belt is a single piece and it cannot move with two different velocities.  So, enhancement of torque which you
expect because of larger diameter at top portion,  will be lost due to slipping.  So, I think you will not get any enhancement of torque or power using a cone shaped pulley.

Whatever circus you do with forces, they adjust among themselves to conserve energy.

Energy is God.  (vineet, as per your Indian belief)

God can neither be created nor be destroyed

So,  energy can neither be created nor be destroyed.


Only thing you can do is prey God Perpeculum to make your machine run perpetually.   


"Failure inaugurates highway for success "-  Lord Perpeculum


Just a joke.   Keep on trying, one day you may succeed.


MarkE

Newton, I agree that lower portions of the belt have to slip.